Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753167AbXJ3Dhd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:37:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751878AbXJ3DhY (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:37:24 -0400 Received: from ms0.nttdata.co.jp ([163.135.193.231]:54498 "EHLO ms0.nttdata.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751536AbXJ3DhW (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:37:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 829 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:37:22 EDT Message-ID: <4726A6EC.6070407@nttdata.co.jp> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:37:16 +0900 From: Toshiharu Harada Organization: NTT DATA CORPORATION User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wright CC: Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk , Casey Schaufler , Simon Arlott , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt , Andreas Gruenbacher , Thomas Fricaccia , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , James Morris , Crispin Cowan , Giacomo Catenazzi , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) References: <20071024223124.GI30533@stusta.de> <446110.89443.qm@web36608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20071024233200.GJ30533@stusta.de> <20071025004128.GC3660@sequoia.sous-sol.org> In-Reply-To: <20071025004128.GC3660@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2007 03:37:18.0828 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C2FC2C0:01C81AA6] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1309 Lines: 30 On 10/25/2007 9:41 AM, Chris Wright wrote: > * Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) wrote: >> Do other people want to stand up and be "LSM maintainers" in the sense >> that they also end up being informed members who can also stand up for new >> modules and help merge them, rather than just push the existing one(s)? >> Chris? Casey? Crispin? > > Stephen and James, despite their clear bias towards SELinux, do try to > give good feedback. But you are right, there's not enough active help > for people trying to make a contribution to get their code in shape. > Many of the modules that come along have been misguided conceptually, > but I think that e.g. apparmor, tomoyo, smack could use that kind > of constructive help to get into final mergable shape. Personally, > I haven't spent nearly enough time reviewing those, my apologies to > those developers. So, yes, help is welcome. Yes, TOMOYO Linux is committed to help. I mean, please count me in. PS Chris, I've been waiting for your comments for our code. :) Regards, Toshiharu Harada - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/