Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:43:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/36] arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20230731-arm64-gcs-v3-11-cddf9f980d98@kernel.org>
References: <20230731-arm64-gcs-v3-0-cddf9f980d98@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230731-arm64-gcs-v3-0-cddf9f980d98@kernel.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        "Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>
Cc:     "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

Map pages flagged as being part of a GCS as such rather than using the
full set of generic VM flags.

This is done using a conditional rather than extending the size of
protection_map since that would make for a very sparse array.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
index 8f5b7ce857ed..e2ca770920ed 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
@@ -79,8 +79,23 @@ arch_initcall(adjust_protection_map);
 
 pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
 {
-	pteval_t prot = pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
+	pteval_t prot;
+
+	/*
+	 * If this is a GCS then only interpret VM_WRITE.
+	 *
+	 * TODO: Just make protection_map[] bigger?  Nothing seems
+	 * ideal here.
+	 */
+	if (system_supports_gcs() && (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) {
+		if (vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
+			prot = _PAGE_GCS;
+		else
+			prot = _PAGE_GCS_RO;
+	} else {
+		prot = pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
 				   (VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC|VM_SHARED)]);
+	}
 
 	if (vm_flags & VM_ARM64_BTI)
 		prot |= PTE_GP;

-- 
2.30.2