Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:19:34 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, paulmck@kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler problems in -next (was: Re: [PATCH 6.4 000/227]
 6.4.7-rc1 review)
Message-ID: <20230731141934.GK29590@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <2cfc68cc-3a2f-4350-a711-ef0c0d8385fd@paulmck-laptop>
 <D56D0318-A2EA-4448-8F4D-BE84706E26A5@joelfernandes.org>
 <3da81a5c-700b-8e21-1bde-27dd3a0b8945@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3da81a5c-700b-8e21-1bde-27dd3a0b8945@roeck-us.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 09:00:02PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 7/27/23 16:18, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > > I freely confess that I am having a hard time imagining what would
> > > be CPU dependent in that code.  Timing, maybe?  Whatever the reason,
> > > I am not seeing these failures in my testing.
> > > 
> > > So which of the following Kconfig options is defined in your .config?
> > > CONFIG_TASKS_RCU, CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU, and CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU.
> > > 
> > > If you have more than one of them, could you please apply this patch
> > > and show me the corresponding console output from the resulting hang?
> > 
> > FWIW, I am not able to repro this issue either. If a .config can be shared of the problem system, I can try it out to see if it can be reproduced on my side.
> > 
> 
> I managed to bisect the problem. See bisect log below. Bisect repeated twice.
> so it should be reliable. I don't really understand it, but the following
> reverts fix the problem. This is on top of next-20230721 because next-20230728
> crashes immediately in my tests.
> 
> 0caafe9b94ab (HEAD) Revert "sched/fair: Remove sched_feat(START_DEBIT)"
> 518bdbd39fdb Revert "sched/fair: Add lag based placement"
> a011162c3e32 Revert "sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy"
> df579720bf98 Revert "sched/fair: Commit to lag based placement"
> aac459a7e738 Revert "sched/smp: Use lag to simplify cross-runqueue placement"
> 8d686eb173e1 Revert "sched/fair: Commit to EEVDF"
> 486474c50f95 Revert "sched/debug: Rename sysctl_sched_min_granularity to sysctl_sched_base_slice"
> 79e94d67d08a Revert "sched/fair: Propagate enqueue flags into place_entity()"
> ae867bc97b71 (tag: next-20230721) Add linux-next specific files for 20230721
> 
> For context: x86 images (32 and 64 bit) in -next tend to hang at
> 
> [    2.309323] RCU Tasks: Setting shift to 0 and lim to 1 rcu_task_cb_adjust=1.
> [    2.311634] Running RCU-tasks wait API self tests
> 
> The hang is not seen with every boot; it happens roughly about once every
> 10 boot attempts. It is not CPU dependent as I initially thought.
> 
> Configuration file is at http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/x86-next/config.
> Example qemu command line:

Hurmph, let me see if I can reproduce on next-20230731 (not having the
older next thingies around).