Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:27:21 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Vincent Whitchurch" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
Sender: tip-bot2@linutronix.de
Reply-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To:     linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/core] genirq: Prevent nested thread vs
 synchronize_hardirq() deadlock
Cc:     Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20230613-genirq-nested-v3-1-ae58221143eb@axis.com>
References: <20230613-genirq-nested-v3-1-ae58221143eb@axis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <169081724175.28540.15276914612023519757.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Robot-ID: <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact <mailto:tglx@linutronix.de> to get blacklisted from these emails
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     e2c12739ccf76aae12e9e949526a475b9d17adaa
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/e2c12739ccf76aae12e9e949526a475b9d17adaa
Author:        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 06 Jul 2023 16:22:25 +02:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:24:22 +02:00

genirq: Prevent nested thread vs synchronize_hardirq() deadlock

There is a possibility of deadlock if synchronize_hardirq() is called
when the nested threaded interrupt is active.  The following scenario
was observed on a uniprocessor PREEMPT_NONE system:

 Thread 1                      Thread 2

 handle_nested_thread()
  Set INPROGRESS
  Call ->thread_fn()
   thread_fn goes to sleep

                              free_irq()
                               __synchronize_hardirq()
                                Busy-loop forever waiting for INPROGRESS
                                to be cleared

The INPROGRESS flag is only supposed to be used for hard interrupt
handlers.  Remove the incorrect usage in the nested threaded interrupt
case and instead re-use the threads_active / wait_for_threads mechanism
to wait for nested threaded interrupts to complete.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230613-genirq-nested-v3-1-ae58221143eb@axis.com

---
 kernel/irq/chip.c      | 11 ++++-------
 kernel/irq/internals.h |  2 ++
 kernel/irq/manage.c    | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index ee8c0ac..dc94e0b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -473,11 +473,12 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
 	action = desc->action;
 	if (unlikely(!action || irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data))) {
 		desc->istate |= IRQS_PENDING;
-		goto out_unlock;
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
-	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
+	atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
 
 	action_ret = IRQ_NONE;
@@ -487,11 +488,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
 	if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
 		note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
-	irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
-
-out_unlock:
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
+	wake_threads_waitq(desc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_nested_irq);
 
diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
index bdd35bb..831f383 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ void irq_resend_init(struct irq_desc *desc);
 bool irq_wait_for_poll(struct irq_desc *desc);
 void __irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action);
 
+void wake_threads_waitq(struct irq_desc *desc);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 extern void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
 extern void unregister_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index d2742af..d309ba8 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -108,6 +108,16 @@ bool synchronize_hardirq(unsigned int irq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_hardirq);
 
+static void __synchronize_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	__synchronize_hardirq(desc, true);
+	/*
+	 * We made sure that no hardirq handler is running. Now verify that no
+	 * threaded handlers are active.
+	 */
+	wait_event(desc->wait_for_threads, !atomic_read(&desc->threads_active));
+}
+
 /**
  *	synchronize_irq - wait for pending IRQ handlers (on other CPUs)
  *	@irq: interrupt number to wait for
@@ -127,16 +137,8 @@ void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 
-	if (desc) {
-		__synchronize_hardirq(desc, true);
-		/*
-		 * We made sure that no hardirq handler is
-		 * running. Now verify that no threaded handlers are
-		 * active.
-		 */
-		wait_event(desc->wait_for_threads,
-			   !atomic_read(&desc->threads_active));
-	}
+	if (desc)
+		__synchronize_irq(desc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_irq);
 
@@ -1216,7 +1218,7 @@ static irqreturn_t irq_thread_fn(struct irq_desc *desc,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void wake_threads_waitq(struct irq_desc *desc)
+void wake_threads_waitq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&desc->threads_active))
 		wake_up(&desc->wait_for_threads);
@@ -1944,7 +1946,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, void *dev_id)
 	 * supports it also make sure that there is no (not yet serviced)
 	 * interrupt in flight at the hardware level.
 	 */
-	__synchronize_hardirq(desc, true);
+	__synchronize_irq(desc);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
 	/*