Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
        andrealmeid@igalia.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, lstoakes@gmail.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        malteskarupke@web.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] futex: Extend the FUTEX2 flags
In-Reply-To: <87edkonjrk.ffs@tglx>
References: <20230721102237.268073801@infradead.org>
 <20230721105743.819362688@infradead.org> <87edkonjrk.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 19:16:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87v8e0m26q.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 31 2023 at 18:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21 2023 at 12:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> -#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_32 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
>> +#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_64 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * futex_parse_waitv - Parse a waitv array from userspace
>> @@ -207,7 +207,12 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute
>>  		if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_MASK) || aux.__reserved)
>>  			return -EINVAL;
>
> With the above aux.flags with FUTEX2_32 set will result in -EINVAL. I
> don't think that's intentional.

Also if you allow 64bit wide futexes, how is that supposed to work with
the existing code, which clearly expects a 32bit uval throughout the
place?

Thanks,

        tglx