Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 18:14:52 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Roy Hopkins <rhopkins@suse.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, paulmck@kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler problems in -next (was: Re: [PATCH 6.4 000/227]
 6.4.7-rc1 review)
Message-ID: <20230731161452.GA40850@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <2cfc68cc-3a2f-4350-a711-ef0c0d8385fd@paulmck-laptop>
 <D56D0318-A2EA-4448-8F4D-BE84706E26A5@joelfernandes.org>
 <3da81a5c-700b-8e21-1bde-27dd3a0b8945@roeck-us.net>
 <20230731141934.GK29590@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20230731143954.GB37820@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <f5a18aa3-9db7-6ad2-33d5-3335a18e4e2f@roeck-us.net>
 <20230731145232.GM29590@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <7ff2a2393d78275b14ff867f3af902b5d4b93ea2.camel@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7ff2a2393d78275b14ff867f3af902b5d4b93ea2.camel@suse.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 05:08:29PM +0100, Roy Hopkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 16:52 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:48:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > 
> > > > I've taken your config above, and the rootfs.ext2 and run-sh from x86/.
> > > > I've then modified run-sh to use:
> > > > 
> > > > ?? qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu host
> > > > 
> > > > What I'm seeing is that some boots get stuck at:
> > > > 
> > > > [??? 0.608230] Running RCU-tasks wait API self tests
> > > > 
> > > > Is this the right 'problem' ?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, exactly.
> > 
> > Excellent! Let me prod that with something sharp, see what comes
> > creeping out.
> 
> In an effort to get up to speed with this area of the kernel, I've been playing
> around with this too today and managed to reproduce the problem using the same
> configuration. I'm completely new to this code but I think I may have found the
> root of the problem.
> 
> What I've found is that there is a race condition between starting the RCU tasks
> grace-period thread in rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread_generic() and a subsequent call
> to synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic(). This results in rtp->tasks_gp_mutex being
> locked in the initial thread which subsequently blocks the newly started grace-
> period thread.
> 
> The problem is that although synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic() checks to see if
> the grace-period kthread is running, it uses rtp->kthread_ptr to achieve this.
> This is only set in the thread entry point and not when the thread is created,
> meaning that it is set only after the creating thread yields or is preempted. If
> this has not happened before the next call to synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic()
> then a deadlock occurs.
> 
> I've created a debug patch that introduces a new flag in rcu_tasks that is set
> when the kthread is created and used this in synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic() in
> place of READ_ONCE(rtp->kthread_ptr). This fixes the issue in my test
> environment.
> 
> I'm happy to have a go at submitting a patch for this if it helps.

Ha!, I was poking around the same thing. My hack below seems to (so far,
<20 boots) help things.


diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 56c470a489c8..b083b5a30025 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -652,7 +658,11 @@ static void __init rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
 	t = kthread_run(rcu_tasks_kthread, rtp, "%s_kthread", rtp->kname);
 	if (WARN_ONCE(IS_ERR(t), "%s: Could not start %s grace-period kthread, OOM is now expected behavior\n", __func__, rtp->name))
 		return;
-	smp_mb(); /* Ensure others see full kthread. */
+	for (;;) {
+		cond_resched();
+		if (smp_load_acquire(&rtp->kthread_ptr))
+			break;
+	}
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU