Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755047AbXJ3Ihw (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:37:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754485AbXJ3Ihn (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:37:43 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:42855 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751992AbXJ3Ihm (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:37:42 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,346,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="363253644" Subject: Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20071030072658.GB20372@elte.hu> References: <1193391787.3019.174.camel@ymzhang> <20071026112307.GA30406@elte.hu> <1193624538.3019.189.camel@ymzhang> <1193650626.3019.198.camel@ymzhang> <1193710325.3019.203.camel@ymzhang> <20071030072658.GB20372@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:36:30 +0800 Message-Id: <1193733390.3019.210.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.2 (2.9.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1514 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:26 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > > sub-bisecting captured patch > > 38ad464d410dadceda1563f36bdb0be7fe4c8938(sched: uniform tunings) > > caused 20% regression of aim7. > > > > The last 10% should be also related to sched parameters, such like > > sysctl_sched_min_granularity. > > ah, interesting. Since you have CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG enabled, could you > please try to figure out what the best value for > /proc/sys/kernel_sched_latency, /proc/sys/kernel_sched_nr_latency and > /proc/sys/kernel_sched_min_granularity is? > > there's a tuning constraint for kernel_sched_nr_latency: > > - kernel_sched_nr_latency should always be set to > kernel_sched_latency/kernel_sched_min_granularity. (it's not a free > tunable) > > i suspect a good approach would be to double the value of > kernel_sched_latency and kernel_sched_nr_latency in each tuning > iteration, while keeping kernel_sched_min_granularity unchanged. That > will excercise the tuning values of the 2.6.23 kernel as well. I followed your idea to test 2.6.24-rc1. The improvement is slow. When sched_nr_latency=2560 and sched_latency_ns=640000000, the performance is still about 15% less than 2.6.23. -yanmin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/