Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp5428786rwb; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFAGyFPTMizgFFqsN4VmNIO/gJVXqMQkPS6T8fE4mAH/uXykE6ExmUPBVXeFK61NylGTttP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:ecaa:b0:1b0:7078:588b with SMTP id eo42-20020a056870ecaa00b001b07078588bmr17624034oab.34.1690881614347; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690881614; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oPw5FtXltbPOUgoqYjSY2pvRLXaHEF8FYLi+mJsg7tDoStslwYn/iTnC4zBVKIFunR kbMcsHniJ2yxFQQnxVN4Qr4Iggf5rJdCs0q6gQB55pjAPuHaaBwtDqB01B8memvXguCE Ms9nA/YOAEuwQ1p8RX/3f66UKcZjJYxNZaPDEuzg9pvDi/O9HpbtMg6cYRuPUR6dyBw2 33GKR0V898M/5kv/gJANDIRMpMzjY0qLVwWPNucrC6tHYlY4n7aMvwMd40mVOuTeLC8e AW5TqCHrewAnc6+pgwDaoU+ue2YHtOAVTMKxLH/dzPlVDi/5vVmyUvc4D+HiaWm8qGg6 aHkg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=U/Emihl8rEYqhoZNoitjVkj7l6VAT+EtBVY6/HfAjkQ=; fh=fM3PyGUzUr+0+zYckifi/gEhAEC/t685IhqUzsZ1I2A=; b=cr3oXHYLmGF/EjqmS8l4SnnDt6p8SZFketrUlJLJETyrM7Ub6Ea0YwWnUw0FN+fAvC V24zHabmyNBJCrsqGyGg2pGmhUuNRBr9RvoAPLUb3dqKUU10gGvsMcAf27sPofDE2YP3 uPTBM+ptKTZjjJO0O3JT1D9VT9B71aFMFlBWTzUYg9df8wYZxLVTYOFqrltvstAws2C6 XmOf4xHD6lgyhlTpkCHnWrbfldotkKnalA7UB0S/MIUwar2xKWGfc1ciyLnPIoPIoMwM fEavMBASUrM3W2WF+oM8dgWVZ/1QWdfBAcBnoZ3kcJhQpoOTBbj98SXvGup4bQIKOaJR aKXw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@alu.unizg.hr header.s=mail header.b=XZHlBMd3; dkim=fail header.i=@alu.unizg.hr header.s=mail header.b=DcHjGL7o; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alu.unizg.hr Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w8-20020a63f508000000b0055c3e731f70si4306597pgh.146.2023.08.01.02.20.02; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@alu.unizg.hr header.s=mail header.b=XZHlBMd3; dkim=fail header.i=@alu.unizg.hr header.s=mail header.b=DcHjGL7o; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alu.unizg.hr Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230504AbjHAIeu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 04:34:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232250AbjHAIeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 04:34:11 -0400 Received: from domac.alu.hr (domac.alu.unizg.hr [IPv6:2001:b68:2:2800::3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA100E6D; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 01:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by domac.alu.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FF76017C; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:34:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=alu.unizg.hr; s=mail; t=1690878847; bh=UXWDskgxlw95RIZ0DjzbONRlRD516JvVYJ02jsHHwGA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=XZHlBMd3fRfOOWQeF8DnRoWO3HqV95GxvtIsus0eRxwd2nmCaVJAOlRpHdy0LJprC ulYlxqzwZ4C9oWRSlRe81I8OjKj3qwYq5oYHsnWPeiDFjck24O0bsmtWCGFiDskAXe 0vutPT2z/IROmwSjPAPbWMmpg8gzxqOdxabbsEzbPP5yMvgtNjpYF5k/uNcN4Z7Ulc 2SHqiFOPHLvvZrAWC3laamXDpG9s5nIDcpqU0r6J0yHSw0vttXVS66XhAIwgX38C0w KvM4svApt2c+mxyjBEDr9B6DWK0OlL09uf8J0byWQ3BonsqJZXCxSHmlgVOvloK5SR 6dBkKyQCPwB/A== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at domac.alu.hr Received: from domac.alu.hr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (domac.alu.hr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lKnUzbz4rVVF; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:34:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from defiant.. (unknown [94.250.191.183]) by domac.alu.hr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EBCC6015F; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:33:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=alu.unizg.hr; s=mail; t=1690878844; bh=UXWDskgxlw95RIZ0DjzbONRlRD516JvVYJ02jsHHwGA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=DcHjGL7oHDx5sJ02WTfo3qDCrUgfgTVacOu6C+kmz9KpRmhRGw87p0pi+t3l1beNL CmESoOfj4+rY5gZDd+B+hiXYg8ZEcfsDe8ujC8nTQLQsVKIb54eWxdgpssuc8JpM57 OGytUFOStnCO7UHowApfPdSwM3xA+N4f3ZRbnz47/9UVcTLXTPk+86+nED/bY2mSYv A/MJqE+FlWIS87jailkZD/cfc/CIwAvdvJZjAMcWsZptaMQnh/9ZeoM02ex5b55OHz c3I97bVeAVUBjqxlNJCL1L9/KdEdakseB0xpfzzbHOGEe3d/fF/MLTcYRl2IR/j8uh /LGgekUICWR9A== From: Mirsad Todorovac To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mirsad Todorovac , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Russ Weight , Takashi Iwai , Tianfei Zhang , Shuah Khan , Colin Ian King , Randy Dunlap , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] test_firmware: prevent race conditions by a correct implementation of locking Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:14:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20230801081404.56387-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ Upstream commit 4acfe3dfde685a5a9eaec5555351918e2d7266a1 ] Dan Carpenter spotted a race condition in a couple of situations like these in the test_firmware driver: static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) { u8 val; int ret; ret = kstrtou8(buf, 10, &val); if (ret) return ret; mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); *(u8 *)cfg = val; mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); /* Always return full write size even if we didn't consume all */ return size; } static ssize_t config_num_requests_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { int rc; mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); if (test_fw_config->reqs) { pr_err("Must call release_all_firmware prior to changing config\n"); rc = -EINVAL; mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); goto out; } mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); // NOTE: HERE is the race!!! Function can be preempted! // test_fw_config->reqs can change between the release of // the lock about and acquire of the lock in the // test_dev_config_update_u8() rc = test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, count, &test_fw_config->num_requests); out: return rc; } static ssize_t config_read_fw_idx_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { return test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, count, &test_fw_config->read_fw_idx); } The function test_dev_config_update_u8() is called from both the locked and the unlocked context, function config_num_requests_store() and config_read_fw_idx_store() which can both be called asynchronously as they are driver's methods, while test_dev_config_update_u8() and siblings change their argument pointed to by u8 *cfg or similar pointer. To avoid deadlock on test_fw_mutex, the lock is dropped before calling test_dev_config_update_u8() and re-acquired within test_dev_config_update_u8() itself, but alas this creates a race condition. Having two locks wouldn't assure a race-proof mutual exclusion. This situation is best avoided by the introduction of a new, unlocked function __test_dev_config_update_u8() which can be called from the locked context and reducing test_dev_config_update_u8() to: static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) { int ret; mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); ret = __test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, size, cfg); mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); return ret; } doing the locking and calling the unlocked primitive, which enables both locked and unlocked versions without duplication of code. Fixes: c92316bf8e948 ("test_firmware: add batched firmware tests") Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Russ Weight Cc: Takashi Iwai Cc: Tianfei Zhang Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4 Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr Signed-off-by: Mirsad Todorovac [ NOTE: This patch is tested against 5.4 stable. Some of the fixes from the upstream ] [ patch to stable 5.10+ do not apply. ] --- v2: minor clarification and consistency improvements. no change to code. lib/test_firmware.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/test_firmware.c b/lib/test_firmware.c index 38553944e967..92d7195d5b5b 100644 --- a/lib/test_firmware.c +++ b/lib/test_firmware.c @@ -301,16 +301,26 @@ static ssize_t config_test_show_str(char *dst, return len; } -static int test_dev_config_update_bool(const char *buf, size_t size, - bool *cfg) +static inline int __test_dev_config_update_bool(const char *buf, size_t size, + bool *cfg) { int ret; - mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); if (strtobool(buf, cfg) < 0) ret = -EINVAL; else ret = size; + + return ret; +} + +static int test_dev_config_update_bool(const char *buf, size_t size, + bool *cfg) +{ + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); + ret = __test_dev_config_update_bool(buf, size, cfg); mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); return ret; @@ -340,7 +350,7 @@ static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_int(char *buf, int cfg) return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", val); } -static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) +static inline int __test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) { int ret; long new; @@ -352,14 +362,23 @@ static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) if (new > U8_MAX) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); *(u8 *)cfg = new; - mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); /* Always return full write size even if we didn't consume all */ return size; } +static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) +{ + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); + ret = __test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, size, cfg); + mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); + + return ret; +} + static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_u8(char *buf, u8 cfg) { u8 val; @@ -392,10 +411,10 @@ static ssize_t config_num_requests_store(struct device *dev, mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); goto out; } - mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); - rc = test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, count, - &test_fw_config->num_requests); + rc = __test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, count, + &test_fw_config->num_requests); + mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); out: return rc; -- 2.34.1