Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:22:28 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc:     Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>,
        Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Shimmer Huang <shimmer.huang@amd.com>,
        Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>,
        Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modify the function to et the highest_perf value
Message-ID: <20230801085228.6f5xley3aybryfjv@vireshk-i7>
References: <20230801004719.1298415-1-li.meng@amd.com>
 <5b92239a-4255-346d-1dfe-c7953535083d@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5b92239a-4255-346d-1dfe-c7953535083d@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 31-07-23, 20:10, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 7/31/23 19:47, Meng Li wrote:
> > The previous function will be deprecated.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com>
> > ---
> 
> This actually has functional impact; doesn't it?  Can you better describe
> the reasoning and expected impact in the commit message?

Also write the $Subject properly like:

cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: ...

-- 
viresh