Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 12:52:29 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@nxp.com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] net: wan: framer: Add support for the Lantiq
 PEF2256 framer
Message-ID: <c27fa438-0885-4e02-a957-ee40b8ef6da1@lunn.ch>
References: <20230726150225.483464-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
 <20230726150225.483464-24-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
 <4adae593-c428-4910-882e-7247727cf501@lunn.ch>
 <20230801124401.3883d16c@bootlin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230801124401.3883d16c@bootlin.com>
Precedence: bulk

> > > +static void pef2256_isr_default_handler(struct pef2256 *pef2256, u8 nbr, u8 isr)
> > > +{
> > > +	dev_warn(pef2256->dev, "ISR%u: 0x%02x not handled\n", nbr, isr);
> > > +}  
> > 
> > Should this be rate limited? It is going to be very noise if it gets
> > called once per frame time.
> 
> This function should not be called.
> It is wired on some interrupts and these interrupts should not be triggered.
> It they fired, something was wrong.
> 
> I would prefer to keep this dev_warn() to keep the user informed about the
> problem.

I would definitely keep it, but rate limit it. dev_warn_ratelimited().

	Andrew