Received: by 2002:a05:6358:700f:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id 15csp660682rwo; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 01:58:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlF+LHol9QMy4LKl+w0xbNkIX0avJbQPdOWJtSH8d8W257X5Fj7wVCB1GBXVEVA9cenSkkR2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b906:b0:268:1b7f:257c with SMTP id p6-20020a17090ab90600b002681b7f257cmr12192281pjr.6.1690966707849; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 01:58:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690966707; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cD7UBF+YnW3jfF1UZzLqGiV38Oa1ymo8tIPV8A7WPwxmZlhPbUTzlJfkvefc9oAiew nProHQwL1wdcICvTkVyVKk8b6cOZX/BknbB9Va9ufd5GNYuqE1CR4OZVldWk0/dx/2FH 3RRsJVi8CHzQpXZozXi7WwgAYZ+HD8SuAqqtRV9z+Z7jZC7FZD4FZtMgbIcpc5LW7rfp CBXFSxTexeYXR9mqwSH9hVnhWhrrKNACjJtAnui7V3gYBbD4Lzc73mR90XaMOZDHhCH3 kZZSTukYb01ZqoV79E45tiX75RMJ60EyCyAztiOjljOhiVKaAcqa9Fq0sCCFAFd3YDSX gj7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=gKGp3nEZ2ER3vBEHBk5LZ6bEkIqYUrNEM9jjCM0TzHE=; fh=+/HBleTELkjhM/kweFZ0pRU3gb/sMWu4MhJN+t2kEkg=; b=hUSl8/hq5ms9YidHH5pQj6y5aFAJPOZEZT07UdsRZiFh5DgGVhNoj7jlQO+0xCkfO1 wwyqXwLVJLWgmb9LxcSUTlK0cM/Ug8AVobcIwLPgqvYH9fEHlcxroqoscXzDBCKD5DhN fH71HihPVBhQhf5Hp8bWyitsjlpbw6cd0s/wjHo66tMwD1GDJJNpGc/uZQk36LjclfkT qyW6j4dhgYHTi2wuieN+woOsFVXcHUVsT/lMwTwUF33IlHzdwoRafDkqnbyvasrng0ag OXCzx8L+yAZDrIXsnge3Kj0mEcVMyk0NI5NbGnD14nPuFUdYS1HVlzYOUPHFNFf7mLgT UZKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hf21-20020a17090aff9500b00268278c51e3si886210pjb.49.2023.08.02.01.58.15; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 01:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233666AbjHBHv4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 03:51:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48466 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232864AbjHBHvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 03:51:25 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163DE1FCF; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 00:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3727mg0M017568; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:48:42 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:48:42 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: thomas@t-8ch.de, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux@weissschuh.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] selftests/nolibc: add test support for ppc Message-ID: References: <0833846b9fc9e2260f9aa2c732a12d9dfa329286.1690916314.git.falcon@tinylab.org> <20230802052150.138283-1-falcon@tinylab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230802052150.138283-1-falcon@tinylab.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Zhangjin, On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:21:50PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > Hi, Willy, Thomas > > Yuan is helping me to test this series and the tinyconfig series with > the latest compilers. > > His first test found this ppc support failed with stackprotector when > using a newer compiler (I used an older compiler without stackprotector > for ppc), I'm debugging it, so, please ignore this revision too, of > course, if time allows, welcome to take a look at the other patches. > > His other tests are trying to find out the exact poweroff support > options for every architecture one by one, let's fill this gap ... Thanks for notifying us. I strongly suggest that you leave ppc32 aside for now, until the rest is completely validated and merged. It turns out that your willingness to work around some of the oddities met on this one have resulted in a lot of drift away from the "keep it simple" principle and significantly delayed the possibilities to integrate the rest of your work. It would be much saner to only focus on ppc64/ppc64le and figure later how to make ppc32 work (or decide not to support it if it's not worth the effort in the end). Regards, willy