Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] selftests: kvm: Add LoongArch support
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>, maobibo@loongson.cn
References: <20230801020206.1957986-1-zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>
 <ZMqLKAWRapQjGgWR@google.com>
From:   zhaotianrui <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <66eb2e6c-7d16-6fbf-7deb-f6d821b1cd8c@loongson.cn>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:14:42 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ZMqLKAWRapQjGgWR@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk


?? 2023/8/3 ????12:58, Sean Christopherson д??:
> Please use "KVM: selftests:" for the scope.  There's no "official" requirement,
> but I've been heavily pushing "KVM: selftests:" and no one has objected or
> suggested an alternative, and I'd really like all of KVM selftests to use a
> consistent scope.
Thanks for your reviewing.
I will replace all the "selftests: kvm:" with "KVM: selftests:".
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023, Tianrui Zhao wrote:
>> This patch series base on the Linux LoongArch KVM patch:
>> Based-on: <20230720062813.4126751-1-zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>
> Is there an actual dependency?  I ask because I'm shepherding along a series[*]
> that will silently conflict with the ucall support, and in a way with the Makefile
> changes.
Yes, this KVM selftests patch series actually depend on the previous 
LoongArch KVM patches.

Thanks
Tianrui Zhao
>
> If there's no hard dependency, one option would be take this series through
> kvm-x86/selftests (my topic branch for KVM selftests changes) along with the
> guest printf series, e.g. so that we don't end up with a mess in linux-next and/or
> come the 6.6 merge window.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731203026.1192091-1-seanjc@google.com
>
>>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |  11 +
>>   .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h     |   5 +
>>   .../kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h         |  28 ++
>>   .../selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/sysreg.h  |  89 +++++
>>   .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S   |  27 ++
>>   .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c   | 367 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c       |  44 +++
>>   7 files changed, 571 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/sysreg.h
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.39.1
>>