Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:15:10 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@sifive.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        <pavel@ucw.cz>, <vincent.chen@sifive.com>,
        <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <conor@kernel.org>, <zong.li@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Change PWM-controlled LED pin active mode and
 algorithm
Message-ID: <20230803-vehicular-leggings-2830239f818a@wendy>
References: <20230803085734.340-1-nylon.chen@sifive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PB2u+tDiCA4uxtSW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230803085734.340-1-nylon.chen@sifive.com>
Precedence: bulk

--PB2u+tDiCA4uxtSW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:57:33PM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote:
> According to the circuit diagram of User LEDs - RGB described in themanua=
l hifive-unleashed-a00.pdf[0] and hifive-unmatched-schematics-v3.pdf[1].
>=20
> The behavior of PWM is acitve-high.
>=20
> Removed patches: 1
> New patches: (none)
>=20
> Links:
> - [0]:  https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/c52a8e32-05ce-4aaf-95c8-7bf8=
453f8698_hifive-unleashed-a00-schematics-1.pdf
> - [1]:  https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/6a06d6c0-6e66-49b5-8e9e-e68c=
e76f4192_hifive-unmatched-schematics-v3.pdf
> - [2]:  https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/1a82e600-1f93-4f41-b2d8-86ed=
8b16acba_fu740-c000-manual-v1p6.pdf
>=20
> Changed in v4:
>  - Remove previous updates to the PWM algorithm.

Why? I don't recall the conclusion on the previous version being that
that patch was not needed.

--PB2u+tDiCA4uxtSW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZMtwHgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0oMBAP9459PoL9HrrQEWgQ+bIJZFoDTz4oSo2vP5a5WyJGiJPAEAlkh6h9+6u46j
Vp1m1aPtTRxrkslLMJnwvuWrvxWbqAA=
=791u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PB2u+tDiCA4uxtSW--