Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:22:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:22:49 -0500 Received: from white.pocketinet.com ([12.17.167.5]:17462 "EHLO white.pocketinet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:22:35 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Nicholas Knight Reply-To: nknight@pocketinet.com To: Dana Lacoste , "'Matt Bernstein'" , Steven Cole Subject: Re: Changing KB, MB, and GB to KiB, MiB, and GiB in Configure.hel p. Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:13:52 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2001 19:20:54.0992 (UTC) FILETIME=[720BCD00:01C1898B] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 December 2001 10:36 am, Dana Lacoste wrote: > > I believe that the main purpose of documentation, help etc is > > to get the > > information across in a way that is most easily understood, ie that > > minimises the number of support questions.. ..and everyone > > surely knows > > what GB, MB and KB stand for. So let's leave it at that. > > Where's the "i" > > in "megabyte" ? Or is 1MiB 1000000 bytes, rather than 1048576? > > 1 MB isn't 1048576. > > it's 1000000 > > mega isn't 2^10, it's 10^6 > > so where are YOU coming from? > > (no, i'm not arguin, i don't particularly care. but i'm > pointing out that some people have completely firmly set > definitions and some other people also have firm definitions > and neither will agree the other's right. MiB is the international > standard for a 2^10 B(yte) specification. so if you mean > 2^10 bytes, you mean MiB, not MB, even if you don't like it :) This "international" standard seems to have excluded a few countries. It wasn't until it was SET that I even heard of its existance. (And then only through SLASHDOT!) Everyone I know has been using KB/MB/GB for 1024 forever. The *only* exception is networking, and the occasional FLASH/ROM size. The latter isn't very common discussion, and among those that it is, they'd know what the other was talking about. For the former, I can distinguish easily depending on who it is. Someone without a lot of experience: I have a 1MB connection. (this user has a 1 Megabit connection) Someone with experience: I have a 1mb/Mb connection. (This person has a 1 megabit connection has used a "standard" abbreviation.) Know how these standards came about? Actual use. Not a bunch of "engineers" in a room arguing over how best to cause absurd changes in kernel help files. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/