Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2023 09:00:45 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 08/21] RISC-V: ACPI: RHCT: Add function to get CBO
 block sizes
Message-ID: <ZMyUDZE0SxoOC696@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230803175916.3174453-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <20230803175916.3174453-9-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230803175916.3174453-9-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:29:03PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> CBO related block size in ACPI is provided by RHCT. Add
> support to read the CMO node in RHCT to get this information.

...

> +	if (!table) {

Why not positive conditional?

> +		rhct = (struct acpi_table_rhct *)acpi_get_rhct();
> +		if (!rhct)
> +			return -ENOENT;
> +	} else {
> +		rhct = (struct acpi_table_rhct *)table;
> +	}

...

> +	end = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_rhct_node_header, rhct, rhct->header.length);

> +

Blank line here is not needed.

> +	for (node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_rhct_node_header, rhct, rhct->node_offset);
> +	     node < end;
> +	     node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_rhct_node_header, node, node->length)) {

> +			for (int i = 0; i < hart_info->num_offsets; i++) {
> +				ref_node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_rhct_node_header,
> +							rhct, hart_info_node_offset[i]);
> +				if (ref_node->type == ACPI_RHCT_NODE_TYPE_CMO) {
> +					cmo_node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_rhct_cmo_node,
> +								ref_node, size_hdr);
> +					if (cbom_size)
> +						*cbom_size = 1 << cmo_node->cbom_size;
> +
> +					if (cboz_size)
> +						*cboz_size = 1 << cmo_node->cboz_size;
> +
> +					if (cbop_size)
> +						*cbop_size = 1 << cmo_node->cbop_size;

BIT() in all three cases?

But how you guarantee it will not overflow? I mean who prevents cboX_size to be
bigger than 30 (note also that 31 in your case is Undefined Behaviour in
accordance with the C standard).

> +					return 0;
> +				}
> +			}

> +	}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko