Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2023 09:40:48 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] HID: cp2112: Cleanups and refactorings
Message-ID: <ZMydcGv8Dvu3Hje1@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230703185222.50554-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <ZMK60UphgVuj4Z+L@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZMK60UphgVuj4Z+L@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:43:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:52:10PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > After I updated GPIO library for the case Benjamin has with CP2112,
> > I have a brief look into the CP2112 driver itself.
> > 
> > From GPIO perspective it has two main (maitenance) issues:
> > - usage of ->to_irq() with IRQ chip present;
> > - having IRQ chip not immutable.
> > 
> > Besides that there are plenty small cleanups here and there.
> > Hence this series.
> 
> Any comments on this?

Gentle ping^2 for this...

Anything should I do to improve it or is it okay to go as is?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko