Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754129AbXJaIxJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:53:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755850AbXJaIwv (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:52:51 -0400 Received: from nwd2mail10.analog.com ([137.71.25.55]:20904 "EHLO nwd2mail10.analog.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755688AbXJaIwt (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:52:49 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.21,350,1188792000"; d="scan'208"; a="55264714:sNHT5008008579" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] Blackfin SPI driver: Fix SPI driver to work with SPI flash ST25P16 on bf548 From: Bryan Wu Reply-To: bryan.wu@analog.com To: David Brownell Cc: bryan.wu@analog.com, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sonic Zhang In-Reply-To: <200710310102.36542.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1193735885-8202-1-git-send-email-bryan.wu@analog.com> <200710310011.33545.david-b@pacbell.net> <1193816110.6971.50.camel@roc-laptop> <200710310102.36542.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Analog Devices, Ltd. Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:52:30 +0800 Message-Id: <1193820750.6971.69.camel@roc-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2007 08:52:35.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[61938DC0:01C81B9B] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2429 Lines: 64 On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 01:02 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Bryan Wu wrote: > > IMO, the spi_transfer.speed_hz <= spi_board_info.max_speed_hz and if > > spi_trasnfer.speed_hz is 0, we should use spi_board_info.max_speed_hz. > > From the meaning of max_speed_hz, the spi_transfer.speed_hz should not > > beyond max_speed_hz. > > According to the interface spec that's not how it works; so I'm > not sure what you base your opinion on. It's not defined with > such constraints. > My opinion is based on the name of max_speed_hz. Actually, I know it is for the controller to compute the baud rate from system bus clock or something similar. > That might be a reasonable policy to adopt in many cases, and > nothing prevents any given protocol driver from choosing to follow > it. But likewise, if the driver chooses _not_ to follow it, it's > wrong for a controller driver to add its own private rules. > > > In your explanation, the max_speed_hz is just a default value. the > > transfer speed_hz can beyond max_speed_hz. > > Kerneldoc for board info says; > > * @max_speed_hz: Initializes spi_device.max_speed_hz; based on limits > * from the chip datasheet and board-specific signal quality issues. > > So yes -- initial value, it can be changed. If a driver says > > spi->max_speed_hz = X; > spi_setup(spi); > > that's how it requests a different clock rate ceiling. It can lower > the rate; it can raise it. > > > The reason it's called max_speed_hz is that most systems compute the > clock rate by dividing a base clock, and few can achieve that exact > value. The name indicates that it's to be treated as an upper limit, > not a lower limit or exact value. The controller driver should get > as close to that rate as it can, without going over. > Thanks for this clarification. max_speed_hz acts as a default clock rate ceiling in the spi_setup(spi) At the beginning of each real spi transfer, we should check the spi_transfer.speed_hz like this: --- /* Speed setup (surely valid because already checked) */ tmp = transfer->speed_hz; if (tmp == 0) tmp = chip->max_speed_hz; spi_set_baud_rate(tmp); --- -Bryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/