Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756966AbXJaJlj (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:41:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753574AbXJaJla (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:41:30 -0400 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:49306 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbXJaJl3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:41:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:43:06 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Jan Altenberg Cc: miltonm@bga.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild Subject: Re: kbuild: possible regression? Message-ID: <20071031094306.GB24100@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <1193821430.3839.88.camel@bender.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1193821430.3839.88.camel@bender.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3903 Lines: 93 On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:03:50AM +0100, Jan Altenberg wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not quite sure if this might be a regression, but I recognized a > change to kbuild's behaviour, which causes some of my build scripts to > fail. > > The build scripts do: > > return system(('make -C %s O=%s ARCH=%s CROSS_COMPILE=%s '+ > 'oldconfig %s %s < /dev/null || exit %i') % > (srcdir, > builddir, > arch, > crosscompile, > target, > modules_target, > FAILED_RETCODE)) > > which results in something like: > > make -C /here/workdir/linux-2.6/common/src O=/here/workdir/linux-2.6/common/build/build \ > ARCH=i386 CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/i686-linux/bin/i686-linux- \ > oldconfig bzImage < /dev/null || exit 1 > > In the past, oldconfig was the first target, which has been handled. > > Now, bzImage seems to get handled at first. That causes my build scripts > to fail, because the bzImage target does a silentoldconfig, which > doesn't allow console redirection. > > [...] > > Kernel log buffer size (16 => 64KB, 17 => 128KB) (LOG_BUF_SHIFT) [14] 14 > Control Group support (CGROUPS) [N/y/?] (NEW) aborted! > > Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration. > > make[5]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2 > make[3]: *** [include/config/auto.conf] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [/here/workdir/linux-2.6/common/src/scripts/Kbuild.include] Error 2 > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > make: Leaving directory `/here/workdir/linux-2.6/common/src' > > [...] > > After silentoldconfig has failed, oldconfig seems to get executed and > after that the bzImage build is starting. So far so good, BUT: My script > checks the return value and fails after the execution of > silentoldconfig. That's why I recognized the different behaviour. > > I did a git bisect to identify the commit, which caused the change to > kbuild's behaviour. The offending commit is: > > commit 0b35786d77ba4037f181982cc8ca20a7a3bf0fd2 > Author: Milton Miller > Date: Fri Sep 21 18:09:02 2007 -0500 > > kbuild: call make once for all targets when O=.. is used > > Change the invocations of make in the output directory Makefile and the > main Makefile for separate object trees to pass all goals to one $(MAKE) > via a new phony target "sub-make" and the existing target _all. > > When compiling with separate object directories, a separate make is called > in the context of another directory (from the output directory the main > Makefile is called, the Makefile is then restarted with current directory > set to the object tree). Before this patch, when multiple make command > goals are specified, each target results in a separate make invocation. > With make -j, these invocations may run in parallel, resulting in multiple > commands running in the same directory clobbering each others results. > > I did not try to address make -j for mixed dot-config and no-dot-config > targets. Because the order does matter, a solution was not obvious. > Perhaps a simple check for MAKEFLAGS having -j and refusing to run would > be appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Milton Miller > Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg > > So, am I facing a kbuild regression? Yes - I will try to fix it during the weekend (if Milton does not beat me). Thanks for reporting and bisecting! Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/