Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 5 Aug 2023 18:19:29 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuan Tan <tanyuan@tinylab.org>,
        Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] tools/nolibc: stdint: use int for size_t on
 32bit
Message-ID: <20230805161929.GA15284@1wt.eu>
References: <20230803-nolibc-warnings-v3-0-bcc1a096ae02@weissschuh.net>
 <20230803-nolibc-warnings-v3-5-bcc1a096ae02@weissschuh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230803-nolibc-warnings-v3-5-bcc1a096ae02@weissschuh.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 09:28:49AM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> Otherwise both gcc and clang may generate warnings about type
> mismatches:
> 
> sysroot/mips/include/string.h:12:14: warning: mismatch in argument 1 type of built-in function 'malloc'; expected 'unsigned int' [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>    12 | static void *malloc(size_t len);
>       |              ^~~~~~
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wei?schuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> ---
>  tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h
> index 4b282435a59a..0f390c3028d8 100644
> --- a/tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,11 @@ typedef unsigned int       uint32_t;
>  typedef   signed int        int32_t;
>  typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
>  typedef   signed long long  int64_t;
> +#if __SIZE_WIDTH__ == 64
>  typedef unsigned long        size_t;
> +#else
> +typedef unsigned int         size_t;
> +#endif

This one breaks gcc < 7 for me because __SIZE_WIDTH__ is not defined
there. However I could trace __SIZE_TYPE__ to be defined since at least
gcc-3.4 so instead we can do this, which will always match the type set
by the compiler (either "unsigned int" or "unsigned long int") :

  #ifdef __SIZE_TYPE__
  typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
  #else
  typedef unsigned long size_t;
  #endif

Please just let me know if you want me to modify your patch accordingly.
I'm still continuing the tests.

Thanks,
Willy