Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:11:23 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/vsprintf: Split out sprintf() and friends
Message-ID: <ZNEJm3Mv0QqIv43y@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230805175027.50029-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20230805175027.50029-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <ZNEHt564a8RCLWon@alley>
 <ZNEJQkDV81KHsJq/@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZNEJQkDV81KHsJq/@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:09:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Sat 2023-08-05 20:50:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > I agree that kernel.h is not the right place. But are there any
> > numbers how much separate sprintf.h might safe?
> > Maybe, we should not reinvent the wheel and get inspired by
> > userspace.
> > 
> > sprintf() and friends are basic functions which most people know
> > from userspace. And it is pretty handy that the kernel variants
> > are are mostly compatible as well.
> > 
> > IMHO, it might be handful when they are also included similar way
> > as in userspace. From my POV printk.h is like stdio.h. And we already
> > have include/linux/stdarg.h where the v*print*() function might
> > fit nicely.
> > 
> > How does this sound, please?
> 
> Not every user (especially _header_) wants to have printk.h included just for
> sprintf.h that may have nothing to do with real output. So, same reasoning
> from me as keeping that in kernel.h, i.e. printk.h no better.

(haven't check these, just to show how many _headers_ uses sprintf() call)

$ git grep -lw s.*printf -- include/linux/
include/linux/acpi.h
include/linux/audit.h
include/linux/btf.h
include/linux/dev_printk.h
include/linux/device-mapper.h
include/linux/efi.h
include/linux/fortify-string.h
include/linux/fs.h
include/linux/gameport.h
include/linux/kdb.h
include/linux/kdev_t.h
include/linux/kernel.h
include/linux/mmiotrace.h
include/linux/netlink.h
include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h
include/linux/perf_event.h
include/linux/printk.h
include/linux/seq_buf.h
include/linux/seq_file.h
include/linux/shrinker.h
include/linux/string.h
include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
include/linux/tnum.h
include/linux/trace_seq.h
include/linux/usb.h
include/linux/usb/gadget_configfs.h

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko