Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230801095702.2891127-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
References: <20230801095702.2891127-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Fix LDO 12 regulator for PM8550
Message-Id: <169143532617.213897.12646437489915335366.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 07 Aug 2023 20:08:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:57:02 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The LDO 12 is NLDO 515 low voltage type, so fix accordingly.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Fix LDO 12 regulator for PM8550
      commit: 7cdf55462c5533a1c78ae13ab8563558e30e4130

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark