Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <09100858-3be2-a9f2-e0af-b6cad67d760b@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:11:43 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [patch V3 26/60] x86/apic/32: Decrapify the def_bigsmp mechanism
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        Peter Keresztes Schmidt <peter@keresztesschmidt.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
References: <20230801103042.936020332@linutronix.de>
 <20230801103816.584394452@linutronix.de>
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230801103816.584394452@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/1/23 03:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
...
> -void __init default_setup_apic_routing(void)
> +void __init x86_32_probe_bigsmp_early(void)
>  {
> -	int version = boot_cpu_apic_version;
> +	if (nr_cpu_ids <= 8 || xen_pv_domain())
> +		return;
...
> +void __init default_setup_apic_routing(void)
> +{
> +	if (nr_cpu_ids >= 8 && !xen_pv_domain())
> +		apic_bigsmp_force();

I thought bigsmp didn't come into play until 9 or more CPUs.  Won't this
do apic_bigsmp_force() at nr_cpu_ids==8?

Should this be:

	if (nr_cpu_ids > 8 && !xen_pv_domain())
		apic_bigsmp_force();

?