Received: by 2002:a05:6359:6284:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id se4csp3533500rwb; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:29:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHBfGwf7e5XpP8kHeYE7w0K0wnq1OHlukv7eFYfpKTkv/+UU/WWTNkMIUXz75l/2NLofVi8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5dd8:b0:99b:c038:fdac with SMTP id p24-20020a1709065dd800b0099bc038fdacmr8229101ejv.20.1691447344027; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 15:29:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691447344; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rsI7oYYXkB90Vt8KSi13dmNRDRsJ05YH+PoX3SM8qSmDm+1HlPsLgxQu969Jz0E5/0 /aBMAEAXqS1YuScvK389+XVGQubll70pz4ciXd6HJPmtPQ63NwEkhrA7nyxYCMC901sL HE4iJAgYGkrMimONKLnKyQPEXWZQGnMfZ2E8/7wOcIGyzChofwnW+V9poFULrG9UEhgH 49XJuFzBsDb/xCLtgeJXS+3JJi5F+9iZbA7j/IeR6/W+yTqwAc/32Bg6PonD09SZTuhZ mVRAyghPgM8y5T1ndqjsa37K+1wY1S7hxnRbTN6WygoX2lkHzF2iUgxDo7bl3eDLMs04 sG4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=Qw8jpG1nSQZOYyCfJYZZJYzqGEK8fUHUpakjpYEfEEE=; fh=EdAFSmIgUzZTC6WCy4Jg1wBZ0/m6m2d/OjiRUJ3BsTI=; b=AChLf7Z0V36R+vevKitjTvZu16ZMmMmjn3YFpN0C7FTGqXMSqkEM2Ssih0MTompSWS PqcUB/KqBf5AlUa9iUtMm+t/I/NxeAkYJ+HKvAViGJX9zBfe7dZdbMRvodUXxKgF/MUL apVBRT8jWryIDRRB8RL6WYXqEnLMHUVlif3OormY+p+wWA6EVW0tcJ5pCJU9IFzJcAK7 ryV1pYRw0suUGl2rInZU8EH31eA4dvhQ4yuE/HbPcP27DoVoCzptQPcnuqU9yp16f+WL XKH9ESuTN+v/8hBrReQz/78sY95i9+YxDuq8719vLN4NoLTDK0rngyq4OyH0azBE/zRb zMXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=sK4wyWyb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt11-20020a170906b78b00b0099283fccb49si5562823ejb.232.2023.08.07.15.28.39; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 15:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=sK4wyWyb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230514AbjHGWCR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:02:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41868 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229515AbjHGWBx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:01:53 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEC294; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32C26223E; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 22:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 533ECC433C7; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 22:01:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1691445710; bh=UGmEM6Ljj6jGLAgDJqTP0WjXv6GPir/AUngl+9/ZENM=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=sK4wyWybLhAOnNierXWH/0oZVONg6PY0hMSTjJ5/2SUXlDatl57c67u6SgTMT5Wz2 rWoPvwvx39L9WWxKN9vkvir26Qf5hw9ZkROL6FB+SjLlQkWsE02+Q9JMpVfd5uQHoC hrpsJzfuRf/U0u1/gnifb3CtO46PDw1KuFQyEIuY8WXXqoZ8bm1Mm9D13myhQ4BuRA Lln+jQjxNxuevaAdMP+1NRO3dwvvd7hKdg+v0vk5FTOMEIyuTeM6JtexgywiHsA5ki RJkqrbvOXFmHSmptFZEN+xMfIRjXkeOhZa1z+eNzP3UjxIq+lHs1i7F/BSMck74hn8 x4DL64ovRRNJA== From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 23:00:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 03/36] arm64/gcs: Document the ABI for Guarded Control Stacks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20230807-arm64-gcs-v4-3-68cfa37f9069@kernel.org> References: <20230807-arm64-gcs-v4-0-68cfa37f9069@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230807-arm64-gcs-v4-0-68cfa37f9069@kernel.org> To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Arnd Bergmann , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Shuah Khan , "Rick P. Edgecombe" , Deepak Gupta , Ard Biesheuvel , Szabolcs Nagy Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.13-dev-034f2 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=10389; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=UGmEM6Ljj6jGLAgDJqTP0WjXv6GPir/AUngl+9/ZENM=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBk0WmaVUMP880FInNYASNKeNNZmYEdEqtaWytN2cgx fsSbzmaJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCZNFpmgAKCRAk1otyXVSH0HcgB/ 973HXExLaz4vkarDYRF6RyG5STwRPay+uFmkHCAn9zvHZZXKje0YTEjb6whFvK/qs+Us99EYhS0OfB 8nysoyClDzt3L2shQZgck+lagj1Ks2+l1O1MZUAp/bQTvYyIoV11ZNLgYHEMXMMJ0T8Ict5+KzolmH y78BblBw8ys5JgJw3VoawfMH6nffNSNL/S86wDwGXIn61CHxRZ/sLF4m+zz3g2S69bZPPI2iEy73hH b6UoNNxutmW3pJm9bgsGw2LJXn96EDK9s4ZSqeE7b93NCC2qN0Mi80YpVVQuOCTta9XEOcO1+qUZRG /iyQCfJvOQx2LAiCDh4H+3a4a4IAAZ X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add some documentation of the userspace ABI for Guarded Control Stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst | 228 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 229 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c0f43961fd4b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst @@ -0,0 +1,228 @@ +=============================================== +Guarded Control Stack support for AArch64 Linux +=============================================== + +This document outlines briefly the interface provided to userspace by Linux in +order to support use of the ARM Guarded Control Stack (GCS) feature. + +This is an outline of the most important features and issues only and not +intended to be exhaustive. + + + +1. General +----------- + +* GCS is an architecture feature intended to provide greater protection + against return oriented programming (ROP) attacks and to simplify the + implementation of features that need to collect stack traces such as + profiling. + +* When GCS is enabled a separate guarded control stack is maintained by the + PE which is writeable only through specific GCS operations. This + stores the call stack only, when a procedure call instruction is + performed the current PC is pushed onto the GCS and on RET the + address in the LR is verified against that on the top of the GCS. + +* When active current GCS pointer is stored in the system register + GCSPR_EL0. This is readable by userspace but can only be updated + via specific GCS instructions. + +* The architecture provides instructions for switching between guarded + control stacks with checks to ensure that the new stack is a valid + target for switching. + +* The functionality of GCS is similar to that provided by the x86 Shadow + Stack feature, due to sharing of userspace interfaces the ABI refers to + shadow stacks rather than GCS. + +* Support for GCS is reported to userspace via HWCAP2_GCS in the aux vector + AT_HWCAP2 entry. + +* GCS is enabled per thread. While there is support for disabling GCS + at runtime this should be done with great care. + +* GCS memory access faults are reported as normal memory access faults. + +* GCS specific errors (those reported with EC 0x2d) will be reported as + SIGSEGV with a si_code of SEGV_CPERR (control protection error). + +* GCS is supported only for AArch64. + +* On systems where GCS is supported GCSPR_EL0 is always readable by EL0 + regardless of the GCS configuration for the thread. + +* The architecture supports enabling GCS without verifying that return values + in LR match those in the GCS, the LR will be ignored. This is not supported + by Linux. + +* EL0 GCS entries with bit 63 set are reserved for use, one such use is defined + below for signals and should be ignored when parsing the stack if not + understood. + + +2. Enabling and disabling Guarded Control Stacks +------------------------------------------------- + +* GCS is enabled and disabled for a thread via the PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS + prctl(), this takes a single flags argument specifying which GCS features + should be used. + +* When set PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE flag allocates a Guarded Control Stack for + and enables GCS for the thread, enabling the functionality controlled by + GCSPRE0_EL1.{nTR, RVCHKEN, PCRSEL}. + +* When set the PR_SHADOW_STACK_PUSH flag enables the functionality controlled + by GCSCRE0_EL1.PUSHMEn, allowing explicit GCS pushes. + +* When set the PR_SHADOW_STACK_WRITE flag enables the functionality controlled + by GCSCRE0_EL1.STREn, allowing explicit stores to the Guarded Control Stack. + +* Any unknown flags will cause PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS to return -EINVAL. + +* PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS is passed a bitmask of features with the same + values as used for PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. Any future changes to the + status of the specified GCS mode bits will be rejected. + +* PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS allows any bit to be locked, this allows + userspace to prevent changes to any future features. + +* PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS affect only the + thread the called them, any other running threads will be unaffected. + +* New threads inherit the GCS configuration of the thread that created them. + +* GCS is disabled on exec(). + +* The current GCS configuration for a thread may be read with the + PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS prctl(), this returns the same flags that + are passed to PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. + +* If GCS is disabled for a thread after having previously been enabled then + the stack will remain allocated for the lifetime of the thread. At present + any attempt to reenable GCS for the thread will be rejected, this may be + revisited in future. + +* It should be noted that since enabling GCS will result in GCS becoming + active immediately it is not normally possible to return from the function + that invoked the prctl() that enabled GCS. It is expected that the normal + usage will be that GCS is enabled very early in execution of a program. + + + +3. Allocation of Guarded Control Stacks +---------------------------------------- + +* When GCS is enabled for a thread a new Guarded Control Stack will be + allocated for it of size RLIMIT_STACK / 2 or 2 gigabytes, whichever is + smaller. + +* When a new thread is created by a thread which has GCS enabled then a + new Guarded Control Stack will be allocated for the new thread with + half the size of the standard stack. + +* When a stack is allocated by enabling GCS or during thread creation then + the top 8 bytes of the stack will be initialised to 0 and GCSPR_EL0 will + be set to point to the address of this 0 value, this can be used to + detect the top of the stack. + +* Additional Guarded Control Stacks can be allocated using the + map_shadow_stack() system call. + +* Stacks allocated using map_shadow_stack() can optionally have an end of + stack marker and cap placed at the top of the stack. If the flag + SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN is specified a cap will be placed on the stack, + if SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER is not specified the cap will be the top 8 + bytes of the stack and if it is specified then the cap will be the next + 8 bytes. While specifying just SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER by itself is + valid since the marker is all bits 0 it has no observable effect. + +* Stacks allocated using map_shadow_stack() must be larger than 16 bytes and + must be 16 bytes aligned. + +* When GCS is disabled for a thread the Guarded Control Stack initially + allocated for that thread will be freed. Note carefully that if the + stack has been switched this may not be the stack currently in use by + the thread. + + +4. Signal handling +-------------------- + +* A new signal frame record gcs_context encodes the current GCS mode and + pointer for the interrupted context on signal delivery. This will always + be present on systems that support GCS. + +* The record contains a flag field which reports the current GCS configuration + for the interrupted context as PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS would. + +* The signal handler is run with the same GCS configuration as the interrupted + context. + +* When GCS is enabled for the interrupted thread a signal handling specific + GCS cap token will be written to the GCS, this is an architectural GCS cap + token with bit 63 set. The GCSPR_EL0 reported in the signal frame will + point to this cap token. + +* The signal handler will use the same GCS as the interrupted context. + +* When GCS is enabled on signal entry a frame with the address of the signal + return handler will be pushed onto the GCS, allowing return from the signal + handler via RET as normal. This will not be reported in the gcs_context in + the signal frame. + + +5. Signal return +----------------- + +When returning from a signal handler: + +* If there is a gcs_context record in the signal frame then the GCS flags + and GCSPR_EL0 will be restored from that context prior to further + validation. + +* If there is no gcs_context record in the signal frame then the GCS + configuration will be unchanged. + +* If GCS is enabled on return from a signal handler then GCSPR_EL0 must + point to a valid GCS signal cap record, this will be popped from the + GCS prior to signal return. + +* If the GCS configuration is locked when returning from a signal then any + attempt to change the GCS configuration will be treated as an error. This + is true even if GCS was not enabled prior to signal entry. + +* GCS may be disabled via signal return but any attempt to enable GCS via + signal return will be rejected. + + +7. ptrace extensions +--------------------- + +* A new regset NT_ARM_GCS is defined for use with PTRACE_GETREGSET and + PTRACE_SETREGSET. + +* Due to the complexity surrounding allocation and deallocation of stacks and + lack of practical application it is not possible to enable GCS via ptrace. + GCS may be disabled via the ptrace interface. + +* Other GCS modes may be configured via ptrace. + +* Configuration via ptrace ignores locking of GCS mode bits. + + +8. ELF coredump extensions +--------------------------- + +* NT_ARM_GCS notes will be added to each coredump for each thread of the + dumped process. The contents will be equivalent to the data that would + have been read if a PTRACE_GETREGSET of the corresponding type were + executed for each thread when the coredump was generated. + + + +9. /proc extensions +-------------------- + +* Guarded Control Stack pages will include "ss" in their VmFlags in + /proc//smaps. diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst index d08e924204bf..dcf3ee3eb8c0 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture booting cpu-feature-registers elf_hwcaps + gcs hugetlbpage kdump legacy_instructions -- 2.30.2