Received: by 2002:a05:6359:6284:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id se4csp4613193rwb; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:59:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG5UnrLzr6bSyQHPvF6SSr8zMJHLpQkgKegZSkNnQ/c+Z2ljfvsZBWDtBT5Fp7+Z0bf3zIP X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1990:b0:268:8ff2:5c0d with SMTP id mv16-20020a17090b199000b002688ff25c0dmr568308pjb.17.1691517557773; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:59:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691517557; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q82wRaF8xayCOwtW5K0qz2t+6cdg8qO4uNvVemwsv7vnh2VJPt+vlNm34xngb2hQu0 LTK59sLtt07VOL2KapTUnshcCT9+qyqLXDENJIzTaD4NH42tQqACiGz2L0W9xx8HoePr /bvgXTLeSNY4RQuQEIacjrpi5a5h4pyIczBUtit05g1DTOzH1ijYTCW0gKzvdamKdRNb RQ6eX2gv/2P4mkv2zCzchC4z2bBNccEmuwk0gwbk18jjDjR8Q99sM6ORPUXFvoeg3wOH +HHK1aRhRr/RCqEn+/8fywV0walXB7z/SJ3qUJYLbBr0Q10iuMMG1HRr6fUhqW+ouolK Er6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=19m9+YAryd9zQqOJKLPS0ScJg55yhuc9Zn7O2SmAkY8=; fh=sDCYtOtQNr4J8m+XjxLSaS1eoEDwapxZAeFBp4YZzdY=; b=wKXPe3NFlsSvZHIpeuxaUgzeL20sozeM1886X34PORV9MEuyNHMOWsY+NIkEWE9vh2 YxIX5O6cOiUPLTibQIE3c2q8AYLQ+o4rkAPN0K1Zm8TjZ3QT9iUqF1IoIMAqGsQK4UiZ 8Q1Ml9APFxNqS3Z8+JB+oPbjZaz1lJSC6PKMjVX3BW4N7nTPVv4ly0RWUwyvv3IbTlZZ IdsNdzxynMnaY4Ikz7jxo8BQhv0WEGFfw5O9v3MhItjOY4NE2PuVQFiNsAhD7xpfK2QM oZtA9NumiQjvyhP5ZXi5IXVt3EnEjjU9ffhsd9+7dQuCKD1z5UhH8jpgeJJ445FL1tkW 338g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="0ypz/M4h"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=gHwsy0hi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id np13-20020a17090b4c4d00b00263aff4ccf0si8222569pjb.3.2023.08.08.10.59.05; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="0ypz/M4h"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=gHwsy0hi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232981AbjHHQfd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Aug 2023 12:35:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232906AbjHHQea (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2023 12:34:30 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01B990AD for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 08:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C5062248B; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 09:53:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1691488433; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19m9+YAryd9zQqOJKLPS0ScJg55yhuc9Zn7O2SmAkY8=; b=0ypz/M4hFEYVg3RIkyKTZpGOtO0OELdvePk4KsvNp0QXKtSQ1NTkwvJ6x9bkVpsk5ACEo+ VdhEFCaw7TRHrCXiaOhP4fR0hWTfeBY2vexIA+Fg3uiY/xr+RGb+kCzEL8ZCXD6x0fD/My 6dCsKBwvmBeEB1+gOW5PonTGZTXEndk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1691488433; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19m9+YAryd9zQqOJKLPS0ScJg55yhuc9Zn7O2SmAkY8=; b=gHwsy0hibpgfl2awLPIMsMc4dKqncic8vqqIN/UioyCepHOo4bgnZRyoxdFoRXKIOTGPXa oVyI5GXsppN4AdBQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53972139E9; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 09:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id eKi8E7EQ0mSBJQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 08 Aug 2023 09:53:53 +0000 From: Vlastimil Babka To: "Liam R. Howlett" , Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Roman Gushchin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka Subject: [RFC v1 5/5] maple_tree: replace preallocation with slub percpu array prefill Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 11:53:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20230808095342.12637-12-vbabka@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230808095342.12637-7-vbabka@suse.cz> References: <20230808095342.12637-7-vbabka@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org With the percpu array we can try not doing the preallocations in maple tree, and instead make sure the percpu array is prefilled, and using GFP_ATOMIC in places that relied on the preallocation (in case we miss or fail trylock on the array), i.e. mas_store_prealloc(). For now simply add __GFP_NOFAIL there as well. First I tried to change mas_node_count_gfp() to not preallocate anything anywhere, but that lead to warns and panics, even though the other caller mas_node_count() uses GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN so it has no guarantees... So I changed just mas_preallocate(). I let it still to truly preallocate a single node, but maybe it's not necessary? --- lib/maple_tree.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c index 7a8e7c467d7c..5a209d88c318 100644 --- a/lib/maple_tree.c +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c @@ -5534,7 +5534,12 @@ void mas_store_prealloc(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry) mas_wr_store_setup(&wr_mas); trace_ma_write(__func__, mas, 0, entry); + +retry: mas_wr_store_entry(&wr_mas); + if (unlikely(mas_nomem(mas, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOFAIL))) + goto retry; + MAS_WR_BUG_ON(&wr_mas, mas_is_err(mas)); mas_destroy(mas); } @@ -5550,9 +5555,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mas_store_prealloc); int mas_preallocate(struct ma_state *mas, gfp_t gfp) { int ret; + int count = 1 + mas_mt_height(mas) * 3; - mas_node_count_gfp(mas, 1 + mas_mt_height(mas) * 3, gfp); - mas->mas_flags |= MA_STATE_PREALLOC; + mas_node_count_gfp(mas, 1, gfp); + kmem_cache_prefill_percpu_array(maple_node_cache, count, gfp); if (likely(!mas_is_err(mas))) return 0; -- 2.41.0