Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758109AbXKAIjR (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 04:39:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753974AbXKAIjI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 04:39:08 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:52456 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754047AbXKAIjI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 04:39:08 -0400 Message-ID: <472990A9.4000309@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:39:05 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL References: <20071101050855.GY7227@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20071101050855.GY7227@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 918 Lines: 25 Adrian Bunk wrote: > I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all > dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless. FWIW, I agree. [...] > As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an > "alpha-test phase" [1], or is it already ready for being used? [...] > [1] quoted from the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL help text I don't know about NFSv4 in particular, but I think we have the whole palette, from "alpha" software which is basically ready for production, to buggy incomplete software which is heavily in production and trains users to lower their expectations. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =-== ----= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/