Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756146AbXKAOB4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:01:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753529AbXKAOBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:01:48 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57341 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753044AbXKAOBr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:01:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:01:46 +0100 From: Nick Piggin To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar Subject: [patch 0/4] ticket spinlocks for x86 Message-ID: <20071101140146.GA26879@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 529 Lines: 15 Hi, I'd like to propose these patches for the x86 tree for a bit more exposure and testing. Or at least get some discussion going again. Just for fun I also had a shot at merging the headers, as they become a lot more similar after this with the removal of the paravirt crud. Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/