Received: by 2002:a05:6359:6284:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id se4csp5538793rwb; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 05:54:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGW3nVz8L+Js+BV5lwGJV1dvDRdwAR59HrK1X5PluOcMbkD0/lO6qD0x1alqRNxgqz102P8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7795:b0:1b3:b3c5:1d1f with SMTP id o21-20020a170902779500b001b3b3c51d1fmr2313707pll.8.1691585648628; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 05:54:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691585648; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bMqZj7mFPjCjiibz1udtgJJoFLguX1kCLefxG92YTD3DWw8SuEggCaAksnyzcwPAW8 VQIwQDfjy7ZwhU66JrTv1pMGC+2LODAAe+GOwjVLIqAnvkiLWZ7hrCyd82R4UoK4OmmM u/hLdQH545bILK6kxNflv+Rszv9WpWY0nRjjHRzjVjJlGNavdMZjGX21KDbLOa+6Rlfk 8LFxHlJfjaRWuFA0X73A1tw1ppPPnMgBaWlbJ861/CWi1qGT+UxMnm7v2J+NlXgSkt4G mdSb8nF4cN4HSJIYAI2XOBdphLeSU7brKh/RorOQQbAG08hZNtFBOmmukmZxw1eFL/ei NPCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=4jcNuI0RwG4Oe2k8CS0Amzmn54vlJQH2irgVBpw5cvQ=; fh=MLC52KOJwspCeASFX4AkpuNhgzbwODsfWLQObczW2To=; b=d7RerdqXXmd+rrgXxXy3u1JrgrbIsOzUMqeSWbrNMtNrHFH90RHI2UMht9unCYiqyf iEzRHdv8P95qaiWOYqjjxC7SgejQdQj7AdRxaiV+dOji5qmye9QSUwFlnCRmvsfOWqwW 6Kepr3c/5602eWrwNUt/bmA0mQ/KDKV91DdGrBDAaeRUz0Z6AqIOnDdZgSQNHIXSkAON LRi0NOQJy1oNncGOERfgLi6P+aN1VLP17nPsey/m9ZmLD2HOrnQgzp8QM617qAtfkbob e06qZZT9IH4Rr1beGddGMPNWHH65g7PlEK9wKALIGWC6bnFa8NkhhToIR/iPrYJpI2mO WRPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=rlrCYjW0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jj19-20020a170903049300b001bc09657ed3si9222781plb.305.2023.08.09.05.53.56; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 05:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=rlrCYjW0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231959AbjHIL7h (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 07:59:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60322 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229541AbjHIL7g (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 07:59:36 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc43.google.com (mail-oo1-xc43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E967F1729; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 04:59:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc43.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-56c711a88e8so4570653eaf.2; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 04:59:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691582375; x=1692187175; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4jcNuI0RwG4Oe2k8CS0Amzmn54vlJQH2irgVBpw5cvQ=; b=rlrCYjW0lciQ7bUPICkiTmi6YRlotO03Drrkm96ynbFst6Jl1rqX3gl+hwmslyiGgQ +7FtoVS+Vps2vOUveYgO6zjwy4/hmwv1HjDGiegO9KHCW6L0NrOVMC4feXPpypW88/Uc uaQA+MnU5fPoiRg4AceXfuPvmIWKnxD5qmizNNJcBbVytuu23kShNLRVLu2ieiMlhHkF cTG0PHTtIq70dQweFGOz2MqfSqw7Kiw826tDP5EyW66QvfJ2w+6SugZgxfYNF0r55DMm 0GDIyby8Nk6aklBtqY4Jy03wwTDXghj346L9V9e43lmo0hRolW1lCYdClzOi0dmSsBQ/ r46g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691582375; x=1692187175; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4jcNuI0RwG4Oe2k8CS0Amzmn54vlJQH2irgVBpw5cvQ=; b=bfPeXEZTD3+tJUU0owBsI7WHpSo5KsLEkqnjZg53dgHmHqLovQRcJa9xJXiuPHACsM bvpWfvS6WnFHi1+uYZIOM3TsphkRKKTQUedAOHUR81VHW5AsT5u/Kg3kiOPUdOJIEYD2 +HaMTxh0FV4J8MsyWIv/A8UNxqzMdoV6L56oTeZkXUcBYGphxgXr05BAjoVlExOh7V9x Y81O5cooQwJtSBiCBFfYM1HQSjE9ZErrt21MrqXvns8rJisAwPkcjJ8ZuDHk/FvNXfaA qQUwkInqXWOFP3S6b1MC4McLdnBjXe5mhBxb6xOOXXas+ycRPdzi0pCzKX7gFwV7pqTu s1QQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzARtv74NFXCB2tgNPQgQGZkorLjn0JvR1mYRuwSec4x4/3Ye3o bMv2Xl5zcrC2Nr0CRyCArTNYfTzUHEuaJJmv6aU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2105:b0:3a7:3ab9:e590 with SMTP id r5-20020a056808210500b003a73ab9e590mr3389626oiw.9.1691582375168; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 04:59:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230809-bpf-next-v1-1-c1b80712e83b@isovalent.com> In-Reply-To: <20230809-bpf-next-v1-1-c1b80712e83b@isovalent.com> From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:28:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] net: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in inet[6]_steal_sock To: Lorenz Bauer Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Daniel Borkmann , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Martin KaFai Lau , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 14:04, Lorenz Bauer wrote: > > Kumar reported a KASAN splat in tcp_v6_rcv: > > bash-5.2# ./test_progs -t btf_skc_cls_ingress > ... > [ 51.810085] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in tcp_v6_rcv+0x2d7d/0x3440 > [ 51.810458] Read of size 2 at addr ffff8881053f038c by task test_progs/226 > > The problem is that inet[6]_steal_sock accesses sk->sk_protocol without > accounting for request sockets. I added the check to ensure that we only > every try to perform a reuseport lookup on a supported socket. > > It turns out that this isn't necessary at all. struct sock_common contains > a skc_reuseport flag which indicates whether a socket is part of a > reuseport group. inet[6]_lookup_reuseport already check this flag, > so we can't execute an erroneous reuseport lookup by definition. > > Remove the unnecessary assertions to fix the out of bounds access. > > Fixes: 9c02bec95954 ("bpf, net: Support SO_REUSEPORT sockets with bpf_sk_assign") > Reported-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer > --- Thanks for the fix! Tested-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi