Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:30:00 -0400
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David.Kaplan@amd.com,
        Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/17] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM
Message-ID: <20230809143000.tus4hqdaobk667eo@treble>
References: <20230809071218.000335006@infradead.org>
 <20230809072200.922634286@infradead.org>
 <20230809135004.2xy76kqpptfqxsp5@treble>
 <20230809140644.GP212435@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230809140644.GP212435@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 04:06:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:50:04AM -0400, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > With the difference being that UNTRAIN_RET_VM uses
> > > X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT instead of X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB.
> > > 
> > > This cures VMEXIT doing potentially unret+IBPB or double IBPB.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h |   11 +++++++++++
> > >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c           |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S           |    7 ++-----
> > >  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > > @@ -299,6 +299,17 @@
> > >  #endif
> > >  .endm
> > >  
> > > +.macro UNTRAIN_RET_VM
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY) || \
> > > +	defined(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_SRSO)
> > 
> > Maybe can be simplified?
> > 
> 
> See patches 9 and 10 :-)

Can still be further simplified to CONFIG_RETHUNK?

-- 
Josh