Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <6b738510-bda4-1517-20aa-135566bb98be@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:04:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Don't disable irqs on shutdown if WoL is
 enabled
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?VXdlIEtsZWluZS1L4pScw4JuaWc=?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
        Andre Edich <andre.edich@microchip.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
        Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
        Divya Koppera <Divya.Koppera@microchip.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Kavya Sree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        Mathias Kresin <dev@kresin.me>,
        Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Nisar Sayed <Nisar.Sayed@microchip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
        Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
        Willy Liu <willy.liu@realtek.com>,
        Yuiko Oshino <yuiko.oshino@microchip.com>
References: <20230804071757.383971-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
 <20230808145325.343c5098@kernel.org>
 <1e438a02-6964-ce65-5584-e8ea57a694bb@gmail.com>
 <ZNLIOEBXNgPOnFSf@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20230809142155.4dtmnmmecaycbtum@LXL00007.wbi.nxp.com>
 <ZNOivVJ+G/sRiwai@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20230809154418.hjkf43ndwfzretiy@LXL00007.wbi.nxp.com>
 <ZNO4RwYzZYUTu1uk@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <2f717c52-0ae5-4702-ab34-7ce0bffe8c86@lunn.ch>
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2f717c52-0ae5-4702-ab34-7ce0bffe8c86@lunn.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 8/9/2023 9:21 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Thinking about this, I wonder whether we could solve your issue by
>> disabling interrupts when the PHY is probed, rather than disabling
>> them on shutdown - something like this? (not build tested)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index 3e9909b30938..4d1a37487923 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -3216,6 +3216,8 @@ static int phy_probe(struct device *dev)
>>   			goto out;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +        phy_disable_interrupts(phydev);
>> +
>>   	/* Start out supporting everything. Eventually,
>>   	 * a controller will attach, and may modify one
>>   	 * or both of these values
> 
> At some point, the interrupt is going to be enabled again. And then
> the WoL interrupt will fire. I think some PHY drivers actually need to
> see that WoL interrupt. e.g. the marvell driver has this comment:
> 
> static int m88e1318_set_wol(struct phy_device *phydev,
>                              struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> {
> ....
>                  /* If WOL event happened once, the LED[2] interrupt pin
>                   * will not be cleared unless we reading the interrupt status
>                   * register. If interrupts are in use, the normal interrupt
>                   * handling will clear the WOL event. Clear the WOL event
>                   * before enabling it if !phy_interrupt_is_valid()
>                   */
> 
> So it seems like just probing the marvell PHY is not enough to clear
> the WoL interrupt.
> 
> Can we be sure that the other PHY has reached a state it can handle
> and clear an interrupt when we come to enable the interrupt? I think
> not, especially in cases like NFS root, where the interface will be
> put into use as soon as it exists, maybe before the other interface
> has probed.

Does it really make sense to have the PHY be interrupt driven for this 
specific board configuration if this causes so much hassle?
-- 
Florian