Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230806213107.GFZNARG6moWpFuSJ9W@fat_crate.local>
 <CACO55tvZD5U4J8DawFTRVnV-dLYLngfhuqO29_sWNEGofKfnBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230807150521.GGZNEIMQ9rsyCmkpoA@fat_crate.local> <CACO55tvWuSdwdirj7S3Dk-r4NAw8jC8g5RHKFd62WXi43iQP-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <87fs4sfu54.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <CACO55tszwFEgt=8xn4auAE7KJVs3ybGG68OzL9HJt19XGVhhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <874jl8fngo.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <CACO55ts9YWF7nLi3Zs4xKySpdHyUFgf4r566cKx3FwNTCaz0Sg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87wmy4e4uk.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <60ef0646-b0ab-b4e0-9eaa-a2c431c5d682@leemhuis.info>
 <CACO55tt=RosBaYPc_wf3NnRC-+prFg2G9E0GEjnV7TSkWjB2HQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACO55tt=RosBaYPc_wf3NnRC-+prFg2G9E0GEjnV7TSkWjB2HQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 20:30:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CACO55ttZUVCVuWpBiTcr1goWWxs2KP1Xxg00X+hYhbpeJzUEFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2b5d1c29f6c4 ("drm/nouveau/disp: PIOR DP uses GPIO for HPD, not
 PMGR AUX interrupts")
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:28=E2=80=AFPM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wr=
ote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 4:04=E2=80=AFPM Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > On 09.08.23 15:13, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >
> > > If this can't be fixed quickly, I suppose it's safer to revert it fro=
m
> > > 6.4.y for now.  6.5 is still being cooked, but 6.4.x is already in
> > > wide deployment, hence the regression has to be addressed quickly.
> >
>
> feel free to send reverts to mainline and add my r-by tage to it and I
> can push those changes up. Sadly those patches fixed another
> use-after-free, but it seems like we have to take another shot unless
> somebody does have time to look into it promptly.
>

uhm and the two patches around that one,
752a281032b2d6f4564be827e082bde6f7d2fd4fand
ea293f823a8805735d9e00124df81a8f448ed1ae

> > Good luck with that. To quote
> > https://docs.kernel.org/process/handling-regressions.html :
> >
> > ```
> > Regarding stable and longterm kernels:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > * Whenever you want to swiftly resolve a regression that recently also
> > made it into a proper mainline, stable, or longterm release, fix it
> > quickly in mainline; when appropriate thus involve Linus to fast-track
> > the fix (see above). That's because the stable team normally does
> > neither revert nor fix any changes that cause the same problems in main=
line.
> > ```
> >
> > Note the "normally" in there, so there is a chance.
> >
> > Ciao, Thorsten
> >