Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758219AbXKARZX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:25:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753160AbXKARZI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:25:08 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:47220 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753058AbXKARZG (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:25:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:23:24 -0700 From: Tony Jones To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children Message-ID: <20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de> References: <20071026204228.GA1519@suse.de> <200710291804.31784.sgrubb@redhat.com> <20071029231529.GB15210@suse.de> <200711011033.53265.sgrubb@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711011033.53265.sgrubb@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1416 Lines: 28 On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Monday 29 October 2007 07:15:30 pm Tony Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:04:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > So when audit is re-enabled, how do you make that task auditable? > > > > No idea. How do you do it currently? HINT: current->audit_context == NULL > > for these tasks. If !audit_enabled, then audit_alloc() is not going to > > allocate an audit_context for the task. > > We are looking into this - at one time it did. Someone should follow up with > a path correcting this soon. But I doubt the audit system will work correctly > if the flag gets removed as there is no good way to add it again later. So on the syscall path you're now going to something like (pseudocode): if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {audit_syscall_entry()} else if (audit_enabled) {audit_alloc(); audit_syscall_entry()} I agree, if this is what you want to do, then clearing the thread flag would be a bad idea. I'd assumed the current behaviour was by design as allocating contexts at syscall time doesn't seem a great idea but if you need the functionality, you need the functionality. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/