Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:43:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To:     hch <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Stephan Wurm <stephan.wurm@a-eberle.de>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Eigner <johannes.eigner@a-eberle.de>
Message-ID: <533238598.5052964.1691621039144.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
In-Reply-To: <20230809223703.GA10719@lst.de>
References: <ZLT2qEYjaWgSpRD6@PC-LX-Wurm> <1293911429.1782934.1691445776353.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20230809135308.GA32214@lst.de> <ZNOec8JmndA63Mnh@PC-LX-Wurm> <20230809141542.GA32614@lst.de> <366198994.5052941.1691620484888.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20230809223703.GA10719@lst.de>
Subject: Re: ubiblock: null pointer dereference using scatterlist in
 work_queue
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Thread-Topic: ubiblock: null pointer dereference using scatterlist in work_queue
Thread-Index: r+jP0Y2+YKP9h0H5tuoMD33XwrLVCg==
Precedence: bulk

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:34:44AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Will do so! So far I managed to get UBIblock work with scsi_kmap_atomic_sg().
>> Sadly now with kmap'ed memory a bounce buffer is needed since IO in UBI/MTD can
>> sleep.
>> Is there a strong reason why scsi_kmap_atomic_sg() needs IRQs disabled?
> 
> I don't think it needs irqs disabled.  Also if you switch from the
> deprecated kmap_atomic to kmap_local first you can sleep and don't
> need bounce buffers.

Yep, for upstream kmap_local will do the trick, but I need also something
for the stable trees.
Anyway, time to get some sleep.

Thanks,
//richard