Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:46:37 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To:     David Vernet <void@manifault.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, peterz@infradead.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org,
        roman.gushchin@linux.dev, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
        kprateek.nayak@amd.com, aaron.lu@intel.com,
        wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] sched: Shard per-LLC shared runqueues
Message-ID: <202308100717.LGL1juJR-lkp@intel.com>
References: <20230809221218.163894-8-void@manifault.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230809221218.163894-8-void@manifault.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi David,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/sched/core]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.5-rc5 next-20230809]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Vernet/sched-Expose-move_queued_task-from-core-c/20230810-061611
base:   tip/sched/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809221218.163894-8-void%40manifault.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] sched: Shard per-LLC shared runqueues
config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308100717.LGL1juJR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308100717.LGL1juJR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308100717.LGL1juJR-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/sched/fair.c:198: warning: expecting prototype for struct shared_runq. Prototype was for struct shared_runq_shard instead


vim +198 kernel/sched/fair.c

05289b90c2e40a Thara Gopinath 2020-02-21  141  
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  142  /**
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  143   * struct shared_runq - Per-LLC queue structure for enqueuing and migrating
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  144   * runnable tasks within an LLC.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  145   *
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  146   * struct shared_runq_shard - A structure containing a task list and a spinlock
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  147   * for a subset of cores in a struct shared_runq.
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  148   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  149   * WHAT
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  150   * ====
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  151   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  152   * This structure enables the scheduler to be more aggressively work
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  153   * conserving, by placing waking tasks on a per-LLC FIFO queue shard that can
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  154   * then be pulled from when another core in the LLC is going to go idle.
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  155   *
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  156   * struct rq stores two pointers in its struct cfs_rq:
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  157   *
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  158   * 1. The per-LLC struct shared_runq which contains one or more shards of
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  159   *    enqueued tasks.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  160   *
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  161   * 2. The shard inside of the per-LLC struct shared_runq which contains the
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  162   *    list of runnable tasks for that shard.
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  163   *
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  164   * Waking tasks are enqueued in the calling CPU's struct shared_runq_shard in
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  165   * __enqueue_entity(), and are opportunistically pulled from the shared_runq in
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  166   * newidle_balance(). Pulling from shards is an O(# shards) operation.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  167   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  168   * There is currently no task-stealing between shared_runqs in different LLCs,
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  169   * which means that shared_runq is not fully work conserving. This could be
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  170   * added at a later time, with tasks likely only being stolen across
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  171   * shared_runqs on the same NUMA node to avoid violating NUMA affinities.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  172   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  173   * HOW
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  174   * ===
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  175   *
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  176   * A struct shared_runq_shard is comprised of a list, and a spinlock for
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  177   * synchronization.  Given that the critical section for a shared_runq is
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  178   * typically a fast list operation, and that the shared_runq_shard is localized
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  179   * to a subset of cores on a single LLC (plus other cores in the LLC that pull
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  180   * from the shard in newidle_balance()), the spinlock will typically only be
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  181   * contended on workloads that do little else other than hammer the runqueue.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  182   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  183   * WHY
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  184   * ===
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  185   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  186   * As mentioned above, the main benefit of shared_runq is that it enables more
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  187   * aggressive work conservation in the scheduler. This can benefit workloads
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  188   * that benefit more from CPU utilization than from L1/L2 cache locality.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  189   *
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  190   * shared_runqs are segmented across LLCs both to avoid contention on the
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  191   * shared_runq spinlock by minimizing the number of CPUs that could contend on
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  192   * it, as well as to strike a balance between work conservation, and L3 cache
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  193   * locality.
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  194   */
54c971b941e0bd David Vernet   2023-08-09  195  struct shared_runq_shard {
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  196  	struct list_head list;
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  197  	raw_spinlock_t lock;
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09 @198  } ____cacheline_aligned;
7cc7fb0f3200dd David Vernet   2023-08-09  199  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki