Received: by 2002:a05:6358:51dd:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id 29csp776201rwl; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 01:05:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFo52au1qdG4Oe2cn9P6etGP4wBatdexHSB2JBEtIExptxJjA4xW3W4wuy+DI6bYu0UumPQ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de93:0:b0:523:33eb:1103 with SMTP id j19-20020aa7de93000000b0052333eb1103mr1330914edv.14.1691654720853; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 01:05:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691654720; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WJnjOIEYzAnXwHgNQODbfdDcNVrRrwebZdxI2pG3VlimcVxR0egsWUwxze6GN/6N9/ QjtD3wTCFeAfUB4Kd7vTzCQ29U4beLGpI/In/PYyuZc1SkEj7lKO6UCx8NpZ+r8TvR6q N0b/ShxKbQi7L6GwW6zI71rdIHQwuBDfEiyRG7xKV1z+Hy3FnrbFd0K8JU066t5Z40oo K9/5ITDNte9RQXbuuU5F/y74bBdfFtiW58tEONhqayMUlzHn8QGEa23AxCJ1IqNFBuCV 68kIyUK5WsH/lp0HpZjQyNEFRV04dW0idh94gfp4Q8OXy/+Nfdrrdc97zrf0bBrTBa3o s4xw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:robot-unsubscribe :robot-id:message-id:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:cc:subject :to:reply-to:sender:from:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:date; bh=4z3qjTKksTG+hc6zmxe0k4gXAH/v+hP6uADhoSiHyGQ=; fh=vkqUiGzLB1kYJlh6VK0MMfK5N8EB/xst0EWTlb2LqmA=; b=i4O5K+l/Lh3OC2VEu8bChleHQwqBd4xMH8VHc3NfsQ2YrpW1CAITu8LR4MU0l7YvY/ VypYaoHWfldB11Dft5jMq9+H6/gPNeRHe/KyjKuTP0pXPFsAbZN9B1T7E0M7ZSzLOG6g G5E7lO9un1DHDEfJiwRMykYBlV09Dt/hnZKv8QfIKefjLdor5T5/COXd1ZUAIjHa/f5K M6PhNaBJLqfORsxol6O44TusSd9egvorc5fqn8ookfyJMErZ/YKO/tcna9kJNKKMPEjR crBqwNVJPFYiMLPW4+jyCv1bUpYFJALnLrJN1N8bAPXwgcPaLKma6GVFMjihiCpMx/R1 L/Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="GWT/dju8"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=yDgXZYue; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z23-20020aa7d417000000b00522c1ee3579si957859edq.640.2023.08.10.01.04.48; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 01:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="GWT/dju8"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=yDgXZYue; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233858AbjHJHLX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:11:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54362 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233752AbjHJHLC (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:11:02 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE1E61718; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:10:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1691651459; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4z3qjTKksTG+hc6zmxe0k4gXAH/v+hP6uADhoSiHyGQ=; b=GWT/dju8VOPbLuI4DTsDCrrChiQQCfD4hR5nc6dRhdyOm1id78vnVgXV4iNPGTMlDoX+S5 dLThzv1bf4ymKrjOODXnr4oaPCc56a532zYh1JiDunN0w/rx2i9KUV9OenjriZWaM54kL8 z9T8V6SPfB1qwfHa4rLNNcug3pyfrJR1m7J8gLUj8p1nIVHJYhnLQrTKzRcRqXeKqm8DVI VxSzr0gu6RGDshkrdp2f5a5ERU1dU4KgUhF1Vf6JVQUabmsWx0pBvIe1DZr8ALoK8cNved Jv5+u/0rWvQNWFy/L0x+7KNDbItcI7I5yxFFvuo2LtWpT8r50jt/tOfzgRiSrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1691651459; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4z3qjTKksTG+hc6zmxe0k4gXAH/v+hP6uADhoSiHyGQ=; b=yDgXZYue2s+mLuDAtnHsNRR6MXRYe7ss414uj/LvSR3OIpIaM3Rh27M6CzOF8B+3M51YPJ kQttk6bIE+UfTSBw== From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" Sender: tip-bot2@linutronix.de Reply-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Add cfs_rq::avg_vruntime Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20230531124603.654144274@infradead.org> References: <20230531124603.654144274@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <169165145896.27769.15700825811302012794.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> Robot-ID: Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact to get blacklisted from these emails Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip: Commit-ID: af4cf40470c22efa3987200fd19478199e08e103 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/af4cf40470c22efa3987200fd19478199e08e103 Author: Peter Zijlstra AuthorDate: Wed, 31 May 2023 13:58:40 +02:00 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitterDate: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:43:58 +02:00 sched/fair: Add cfs_rq::avg_vruntime In order to move to an eligibility based scheduling policy, we need to have a better approximation of the ideal scheduler. Specifically, for a virtual time weighted fair queueing based scheduler the ideal scheduler will be the weighted average of the individual virtual runtimes (math in the comment). As such, compute the weighted average to approximate the ideal scheduler -- note that the approximation is in the individual task behaviour, which isn't strictly conformant. Specifically consider adding a task with a vruntime left of center, in this case the average will move backwards in time -- something the ideal scheduler would of course never do. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230531124603.654144274@infradead.org --- kernel/sched/debug.c | 32 ++++------ kernel/sched/fair.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++- 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index aeeba46..e48d2b2 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -627,10 +627,9 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu) void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { - s64 MIN_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, max_vruntime = -1, - spread, rq0_min_vruntime, spread0; + s64 left_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, right_vruntime = -1, spread; + struct sched_entity *last, *first; struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); - struct sched_entity *last; unsigned long flags; #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED @@ -644,26 +643,25 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) SPLIT_NS(cfs_rq->exec_clock)); raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags); - if (rb_first_cached(&cfs_rq->tasks_timeline)) - MIN_vruntime = (__pick_first_entity(cfs_rq))->vruntime; + first = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq); + if (first) + left_vruntime = first->vruntime; last = __pick_last_entity(cfs_rq); if (last) - max_vruntime = last->vruntime; + right_vruntime = last->vruntime; min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime; - rq0_min_vruntime = cpu_rq(0)->cfs.min_vruntime; raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, flags); - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "MIN_vruntime", - SPLIT_NS(MIN_vruntime)); + + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "left_vruntime", + SPLIT_NS(left_vruntime)); SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "min_vruntime", SPLIT_NS(min_vruntime)); - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "max_vruntime", - SPLIT_NS(max_vruntime)); - spread = max_vruntime - MIN_vruntime; - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "spread", - SPLIT_NS(spread)); - spread0 = min_vruntime - rq0_min_vruntime; - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "spread0", - SPLIT_NS(spread0)); + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "avg_vruntime", + SPLIT_NS(avg_vruntime(cfs_rq))); + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "right_vruntime", + SPLIT_NS(right_vruntime)); + spread = right_vruntime - left_vruntime; + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "spread", SPLIT_NS(spread)); SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %d\n", "nr_spread_over", cfs_rq->nr_spread_over); SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %d\n", "nr_running", cfs_rq->nr_running); diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index d3df5b1..bb54606 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -601,9 +601,134 @@ static inline bool entity_before(const struct sched_entity *a, return (s64)(a->vruntime - b->vruntime) < 0; } +static inline s64 entity_key(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + return (s64)(se->vruntime - cfs_rq->min_vruntime); +} + #define __node_2_se(node) \ rb_entry((node), struct sched_entity, run_node) +/* + * Compute virtual time from the per-task service numbers: + * + * Fair schedulers conserve lag: + * + * \Sum lag_i = 0 + * + * Where lag_i is given by: + * + * lag_i = S - s_i = w_i * (V - v_i) + * + * Where S is the ideal service time and V is it's virtual time counterpart. + * Therefore: + * + * \Sum lag_i = 0 + * \Sum w_i * (V - v_i) = 0 + * \Sum w_i * V - w_i * v_i = 0 + * + * From which we can solve an expression for V in v_i (which we have in + * se->vruntime): + * + * \Sum v_i * w_i \Sum v_i * w_i + * V = -------------- = -------------- + * \Sum w_i W + * + * Specifically, this is the weighted average of all entity virtual runtimes. + * + * [[ NOTE: this is only equal to the ideal scheduler under the condition + * that join/leave operations happen at lag_i = 0, otherwise the + * virtual time has non-continguous motion equivalent to: + * + * V +-= lag_i / W + * + * Also see the comment in place_entity() that deals with this. ]] + * + * However, since v_i is u64, and the multiplcation could easily overflow + * transform it into a relative form that uses smaller quantities: + * + * Substitute: v_i == (v_i - v0) + v0 + * + * \Sum ((v_i - v0) + v0) * w_i \Sum (v_i - v0) * w_i + * V = ---------------------------- = --------------------- + v0 + * W W + * + * Which we track using: + * + * v0 := cfs_rq->min_vruntime + * \Sum (v_i - v0) * w_i := cfs_rq->avg_vruntime + * \Sum w_i := cfs_rq->avg_load + * + * Since min_vruntime is a monotonic increasing variable that closely tracks + * the per-task service, these deltas: (v_i - v), will be in the order of the + * maximal (virtual) lag induced in the system due to quantisation. + * + * Also, we use scale_load_down() to reduce the size. + * + * As measured, the max (key * weight) value was ~44 bits for a kernel build. + */ +static void +avg_vruntime_add(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(se->load.weight); + s64 key = entity_key(cfs_rq, se); + + cfs_rq->avg_vruntime += key * weight; + cfs_rq->avg_load += weight; +} + +static void +avg_vruntime_sub(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(se->load.weight); + s64 key = entity_key(cfs_rq, se); + + cfs_rq->avg_vruntime -= key * weight; + cfs_rq->avg_load -= weight; +} + +static inline +void avg_vruntime_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s64 delta) +{ + /* + * v' = v + d ==> avg_vruntime' = avg_runtime - d*avg_load + */ + cfs_rq->avg_vruntime -= cfs_rq->avg_load * delta; +} + +u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) +{ + struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; + s64 avg = cfs_rq->avg_vruntime; + long load = cfs_rq->avg_load; + + if (curr && curr->on_rq) { + unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(curr->load.weight); + + avg += entity_key(cfs_rq, curr) * weight; + load += weight; + } + + if (load) + avg = div_s64(avg, load); + + return cfs_rq->min_vruntime + avg; +} + +static u64 __update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime) +{ + u64 min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime; + /* + * open coded max_vruntime() to allow updating avg_vruntime + */ + s64 delta = (s64)(vruntime - min_vruntime); + if (delta > 0) { + avg_vruntime_update(cfs_rq, delta); + min_vruntime = vruntime; + } + return min_vruntime; +} + static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; @@ -629,7 +754,7 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) /* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */ u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, - max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime)); + __update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq, vruntime)); } static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) @@ -642,12 +767,14 @@ static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) */ static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { + avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se); rb_add_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline, __entity_less); } static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { rb_erase_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline); + avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se); } struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) @@ -3379,6 +3506,8 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, /* commit outstanding execution time */ if (cfs_rq->curr == se) update_curr(cfs_rq); + else + avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se); update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight); } dequeue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se); @@ -3394,9 +3523,11 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, #endif enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se); - if (se->on_rq) + if (se->on_rq) { update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight); - + if (cfs_rq->curr != se) + avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se); + } } void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio) diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 9baeb1a..52a0a4b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -548,6 +548,9 @@ struct cfs_rq { unsigned int idle_nr_running; /* SCHED_IDLE */ unsigned int idle_h_nr_running; /* SCHED_IDLE */ + s64 avg_vruntime; + u64 avg_load; + u64 exec_clock; u64 min_vruntime; #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE @@ -3483,4 +3486,6 @@ static inline void task_tick_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) { } static inline void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t) { } #endif +extern u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); + #endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */