Received: by 2002:ac8:5491:0:b0:40f:fb00:664b with SMTP id h17csp657317qtq; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGo6KynZauHNt6BFuk9aJeS7W+80MvQVfqXytc9h6NDsBe12qynlfWjIv20knJJdNEq+18Q X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cc1:b0:99c:ae35:8cd with SMTP id l1-20020a1709060cc100b0099cae3508cdmr2189323ejh.43.1691693730964; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691693730; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dXZCmgU3SrL6vc0/IHeXcJMWV0KMwkf4HCtPgNBZ/iR2Fyjzys1PB9Pu3gDHvVvHX+ ZrFbRB4mLBh67+LAbtQ3eAuGaQuEhgqM9yZCz3tU6WcSM0kW0bVfmS8c83NKq4bMQF1v MTP/mQrrJDJrGn4nnTllJFKcWRu5IsyN0nPoa5Cyezc2TUBzWsQMQCHjTUbr69oGUFwu Wpn+tDFzR8s3FGtglKgjHYVj0BXoMqDzAYwoVfubd0osXXKumwxxfUZJrivFiby9OEgp gLWh79rzEfsuomVtBaEnAe4faYOciEk68WsNj5wW/FI/fmaHW663ibRyodDLwF9feNo8 p3dw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:date:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-signature:message-id; bh=tcStbJBYGm1S6mX3lupmzFXgqW4kHxxe4AHt7jQaeKc=; fh=Vp72a/EEov1VOHpGPkCjAnDQEmhhYrQPa+PSfT8H2jQ=; b=OUyiI3+SVR+dXUwfonGYLh32WqGBInCwbPLk26dnQuyOAi7FRtT7tQNXrYYzrYGEX/ KwM7Jrain+eZCii72wJ+p8POrwXKOOcmbSbd9fAqIimPQ/LN1roG2PipnyCHj9/pLPp0 u2rXteDX88Xm9GgUS2k0max2cG/3RMPMuHK7OgsV4GqHFZ50eyt6356N2kOZ+WuJRNLP s3K9ml/+3oEDYQH7/KBwjDQe6OpFKf894Mdw9Q4ap72yLOMWfWEV4DqMMJHwsE+tUMY6 S7IcPncFt+9hxmDQOw0+RdKUuzAIrYU79g/XOZHWfbBr0iRS86gY4FKiRfE9+99VWGH+ DNgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=BK8zvgyb; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u6-20020a170906950600b0099bc0da5048si1954765ejx.376.2023.08.10.11.55.06; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=BK8zvgyb; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236002AbjHJSjQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:39:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57820 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235884AbjHJSis (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:38:48 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 399AD3593 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20230810160806.278309863@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1691692680; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=tcStbJBYGm1S6mX3lupmzFXgqW4kHxxe4AHt7jQaeKc=; b=BK8zvgybjP1VRz8owhKpmUoYJTaY2grbwTSp63RtJ0jjHrgah88eWcH2X2OAt++AkS597K LQ7KmkGrUVfCC0hnQkcwoqGPurswG0bT/4+f/C8eqMQxXqcPEi3PhKiwuFhGi72jwcl93f d6t+aEwD7fXSKl33KKCeAD48QMQHXpv9ObCIsooWtWm7W7fSkTzlqaiNgooNNrDrxw0/p7 vlO6uM2x9BGwQHWICw7kJY2cXJbGHPXRXYnA3quDVo6AZc0XtDDRxsWrLYUdEmVGs4NR5d 99zAVTDCJDb31c/DtHaVxptyrhI4pMQxYN/MNxNuK36wGmJdKy5bgHlVJxa7Xw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1691692680; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=tcStbJBYGm1S6mX3lupmzFXgqW4kHxxe4AHt7jQaeKc=; b=Pef8bkf9YkrSQw6MIti7Z4Ea3arQVLoWmn6JV/mxbUiLzAyIiGcaY+xhpUdox206SY61F8 zlDbK7DGnrhGHiDg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Ashok Raj , Arjan van de Ven Subject: [patch 23/30] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions References: <20230810153317.850017756@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:38:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Gleixner The current all in one code is unreadable and really not suited for adding future features like uniform loading with package or system scope. Provide a set of new control functions which split the handling of the primary and secondary CPUs. These will replace the current rendevouz all in one function in the next step. This is intentionally a separate change because diff makes an complete unreadable mess otherwise. So the flow separates the primary and the secondary CPUs into their own functions, which use the control field in the per CPU ucode_ctrl struct. primary() secondary() wait_for_all() wait_for_all() apply_ucode() wait_for_release() release() apply_ucode() Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) --- --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -357,6 +357,92 @@ static bool wait_for_cpus(atomic_t *cnt) return false; } +static bool wait_for_ctrl(void) +{ + unsigned int timeout; + + for (timeout = 0; timeout < USEC_PER_SEC; timeout++) { + if (this_cpu_read(ucode_ctrl.ctrl) != SCTRL_WAIT) + return true; + udelay(1); + if (!(timeout % 1000)) + touch_nmi_watchdog(); + } + return false; +} + +static __maybe_unused void ucode_load_secondary(unsigned int cpu) +{ + unsigned int ctrl_cpu = this_cpu_read(ucode_ctrl.ctrl_cpu); + enum ucode_state ret; + + /* Initial rendevouz to ensure that all CPUs have arrived */ + if (!wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_in)) { + pr_err_once("Microcode load: %d CPUs timed out\n", + atomic_read(&late_cpus_in) - 1); + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.result, UCODE_TIMEOUT); + return; + } + + /* + * Wait for primary threads to complete. If one of them hangs due + * to the update, there is no way out. This is non-recoverable + * because the CPU might hold locks or resources and confuse the + * scheduler, watchdogs etc. There is no way to safely evacuate the + * machine. + */ + if (!wait_for_ctrl()) + panic("Microcode load: Primary CPU %d timed out\n", ctrl_cpu); + + /* + * If the primary succeeded then invoke the apply() callback, + * otherwise copy the state from the primary thread. + */ + if (this_cpu_read(ucode_ctrl.ctrl) == SCTRL_APPLY) + ret = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu); + else + ret = per_cpu(ucode_ctrl.result, ctrl_cpu); + + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.result, ret); + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.ctrl, SCTRL_DONE); +} + +static __maybe_unused void ucode_load_primary(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct cpumask *secondaries = topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu); + enum sibling_ctrl ctrl; + enum ucode_state ret; + unsigned int sibling; + + /* Initial rendevouz to ensure that all CPUs have arrived */ + if (!wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_in)) { + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.result, UCODE_TIMEOUT); + pr_err_once("Microcode load: %d CPUs timed out\n", + atomic_read(&late_cpus_in) - 1); + return; + } + + ret = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu); + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.result, ret); + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.ctrl, SCTRL_DONE); + + /* + * If the update was successful, let the siblings run the apply() + * callback. If not, tell them it's done. This also covers the + * case where the CPU has uniform loading at package or system + * scope implemented but does not advertise it. + */ + if (ret == UCODE_UPDATED || ret == UCODE_OK) + ctrl = SCTRL_APPLY; + else + ctrl = SCTRL_DONE; + + for_each_cpu(sibling, secondaries) { + if (sibling != cpu) + per_cpu(ucode_ctrl.ctrl, sibling) = ctrl; + } +} + static int ucode_load_cpus_stopped(void *unused) { int cpu = smp_processor_id();