Received: by 2002:a05:7412:6592:b0:d7:7d3a:4fe2 with SMTP id m18csp583845rdg; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:14:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHP4yzDeI6n1ssioPr47fD7MqRvyICdf57V0Z8HRQrsH/RvYKB1wg65jJWnE7H+2bk+4ZOJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:292a:b0:991:cd1f:e67a with SMTP id v10-20020a170906292a00b00991cd1fe67amr2757526ejd.29.1691694854243; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:14:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691694854; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A1lFs5/X88X38URPqORxnW7ZAkdc8wmCJjKzPPaa3hQP/Maa6XayaFduNxVDhOQOzw pYpHmT82RrGj+rkUVPlH62zEyWaGBpG9gGu2V1ve0nR3HC5YGTXqK9co92Vj2Jjq4FJY +YFhtNHBDu59WrED/6Sv/aSg/kjduui5mN8RmICch+DF+cuCljM39bZkFLcMv7YMbeV+ dbpcArvSzjYJeXRhjICX53ROsBe7p0ERdpRgtJM1One0OIYKtJET5F6XA95Ph9IFBhLG fgLxTew2+BSVjluz6M1gmj4KvG2UNXgHLZs0saOTrpQMyVYEwiZdMLubu6bcsPaeluWN dkXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=RSla7vrSohzEwjPqJ/9bD+Uy3YlKlM1Eu70SOIvSRWw=; fh=bgDDmRChl8nwvY/5pjSkx0H4p0RIg1Md9Dlnk9ambyI=; b=H4bVySvcvkzxU3mkpckxC6Sq/qRF6JO2Pd2N2y9m3/6DxQKuDdTfHCxGzKzMrVfEbO Lwvn6rTvz1epWLs+NdjoJUSwUDMvw7UXBg1t3Wy2j7WS2DG4+AM3R4OEHpKpafKGr57R 0v0sGghSZpfvdgCTDWe8ACq9FeQ7OPimZFFtR6eeM9vAkGL483MbbfVVGCNLu44MgF5p imYLgfssD++W2IKEUNt0PpjDjdfqlBuQusreKxwkZWlwk5q9q597CgjDuwsZXaNMPIIU lMTRfd5dqnwgtaxQhGAnIbowNE/xe0Q4yzM86vvjc2M7btQTiaxcmOxk1MdvMvXO7vKA TIpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Ywhfgrcx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y9-20020a170906070900b00988c552332fsi1987465ejb.300.2023.08.10.12.13.49; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Ywhfgrcx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233796AbjHJS3t (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:29:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231402AbjHJS3s (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:29:48 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F6426B9; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C86665D1; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFFEBC433C8; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:29:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1691692186; bh=jxNTEHQ1rDKvHKrXbpmXZW+78WS0axoYkSgFcfeewyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=YwhfgrcxEI14djj1JXkWfHJJPXIFbgyIl4eeP1OjLCZH+0dY1sE8WCi3P0++iGgxQ VY5WhJU19JpSYM6qp0oh8oQNEOsfcQWKsbaFDR1VdaULbqHC7/3VguETLHW0sTo2G/ sMdIpnKWCY5CArhEjeZ1X5iVUzIPcBzoN4RM3NSm+XLBy1FCCytfhWtYXfnt4908+2 4O4pVwViXMzuW4ctTAM5IXo6TEN6bvC7p7V9QzqWFkU8e7dzlOat3qorNMIQAQvFtZ kmGzrpx5IUXt/ji6DcAsMmqnvCbynQvvux9c9+3X8o116fZkshHpIljWVo2T3x6zmk DyY2SGVPI4ttQ== Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:29:44 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Alex Williamson Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Protect VPD and PME accesses from power management Message-ID: <20230810182944.GA37564@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230803171233.3810944-1-alex.williamson@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:12:31AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > Since v5.19, vfio-pci makes use of runtime power management on devices. > This has the effect of potentially putting entire sub-hierarchies into > lower power states, which has exposed some gaps in the PCI subsystem > around power management support. > > The first issue is that lspci accesses the VPD sysfs interface, which > does not provide the same power management wrappers as general config > space. > > The next covers PME, where we attempt to skip devices based on their PCI > power state, but don't protect changes to that state or look at the > overall runtime power management state of the device. > > This latter patch addresses the issue noted by Eric in the follow-ups to > v1 linked below. > > These patches are logically independent, but only together resolve an > issue on Eric's system where a pair of endpoints bound to vfio-pci and > unused by userspace drivers trigger faults through lspci and PME > polling. Thanks, > > Alex > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230707151044.1311544-1-alex.williamson@redhat.com/ > > Alex Williamson (2): > PCI/VPD: Add runtime power management to sysfs interface > PCI: Fix runtime PM race with PME polling > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/pci/vpd.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Applied with the tweak below to pci/vpd for v6.6, thanks! The idea is to match the pci_get_func0_dev() so the get/put balance is clear without having to analyze PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 usage: - if (dev != vpd_dev) + if (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0)