Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <22fd0d8e-ef10-8ce5-09d1-ff136f594c8c@baylibre.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:09:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spmi: mtk-pmif: Serialize PMIF status check and
 command submission
Content-Language: en-US
To:     =?UTF-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4gUHJhZG8=?= 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@google.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>,
        James Lo <james.lo@mediatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
References: <20230724154739.493724-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
From:   Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230724154739.493724-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>

On 24/07/2023 17:47, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> Before writing the read or write command to the SPMI arbiter through the
> PMIF interface, the current status of the channel is checked to ensure
> it is idle. However, since the status only changes from idle when the
> command is written, it is possible for two concurrent calls to determine
> that the channel is idle and simultaneously send their commands. At this
> point the PMIF interface hangs, with the status register no longer being
> updated, and thus causing all subsequent operations to time out.
> 
> This was observed on the mt8195-cherry-tomato-r2 machine, particularly
> after commit 46600ab142f8 ("regulator: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for
> drivers between 5.10 and 5.15") was applied, since then the two MT6315
> devices present on the SPMI bus would probe assynchronously and
> sometimes (during probe or at a later point) read the bus
> simultaneously, breaking the PMIF interface and consequently slowing
> down the whole system.
> 
> To fix the issue at its root cause, introduce locking around the channel
> status check and the command write, so that both become an atomic
> operation, preventing race conditions between two (or more) SPMI bus
> read/write operations. A spinlock is used since this is a fast bus, as
> indicated by the usage of the atomic variant of readl_poll, and
> '.fast_io = true' being used in the mt6315 driver, so spinlocks are
> already used for the regmap access.

-- 
Regards,
Alexandre