Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:38:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:38:15 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([62.49.180.5]:29354 "EHLO noodles.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:38:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , andrea@suse.de, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, Chuck Lever Subject: Re: Possible O_DIRECT problems ? Message-ID: <20011221003942.B26268@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Trond Myklebust , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , andrea@suse.de, Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <20011221000806.A26849@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 01:23:45AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > O_DIRECT for NFS isn't yet merged into the kernel. Are these Chuck > Lever's NFS patches you've been testing? Nope, stock 2.4.17rc2 & 2.5.1. I thought NFS might just ignore the O_DIRECT flag if it didn't understand it yet, I wasn't expecting such a dramatic failure. I just got reminded of the bugs Andrew Morton & some others found in O_DIRECT, so this may be hitting the same problems already found. Dave. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/