Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:57:18 +0100
From:   Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
To:     wuxilin123@gmail.com
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rc: ir-spi: Correct regulator name
Message-ID: <ZNYF/iGqrBQrV3IT@gofer.mess.org>
References: <20230805-ir-spi-v1-1-33af4a556139@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230805-ir-spi-v1-1-33af4a556139@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 07:23:35PM +0800, Xilin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@gmail.com>
> 
> The driver wrongly assumes regulator is called "irda_regulator"
> instead of "power".
> 
> Change it to "power" to match device tree binding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> index bbc81bed4f90..a447bb36100d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int ir_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	if (!idata)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	idata->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "irda_regulator");
> +	idata->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "power");

I agree that irda_regulator is not a great name and it probably should have
been picked up in review. However, is it safe to change without breaking
backwards compatibility?

Rob, what do you think?

Thanks
Sean

>  	if (IS_ERR(idata->regulator))
>  		return PTR_ERR(idata->regulator);
>  
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 024ff300db33968c133435a146d51ac22db27374
> change-id: 20230805-ir-spi-3473c5f34764
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@gmail.com>