Received: by 2002:a05:7412:6592:b0:d7:7d3a:4fe2 with SMTP id m18csp1445858rdg; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHjVzqXmktn49FC5+HKL2+nS0ZrLBOlt7dhG8N7pPuXaF1olpBvck+qXv1P39C+LINZm4j8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:10da:b0:988:f1ec:7400 with SMTP id v26-20020a17090610da00b00988f1ec7400mr3895419ejv.36.1691828188097; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691828188; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sBU1i8sf4MtCcgMJQ95RCsLWEaympKVMjxIwzaTnCIDlKp4GuboDTZbVqq+G36+vdb KaDUhhnoD+O196MRFVsU03HwyTRlaq5gHcBKkAcICdtfHw8JQJBsLeQvQg5taE0RaTJ9 HMyhWlXAuwVE6+HQUPn5lky+425bdoEs+WLtc1YYE6uu8l0dRnkVYS0tcR/I2jpMZ6is o8Zb+8xxSwACfB208y0fZWVpuTJCWm3ajaxb8Zgg5B4UoOwP0W0RKO0KsMdQ49mv2swR ya9OK4wZ90FrAumoHZNco0lBitGWuZ5RLtW33gWp80knorb/rSTcK90scN5kELWcmS7J rS0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=IAPjqNO6XfuNqiAqdgrTaJ2YTVvcL+EShsJ9mWunmCA=; fh=WoZ4fNNNIZnSPi8Ia+EEStz3ApU7UINPdNPlH+WCKm8=; b=dZvz8LOKs/ArJJOBsoHM8bNG/RzvUZljW4FkN65D0zpSf0HcyJdAI6lskooPyWLcaN mfUocZ/EfWbsJyEQ9pvK8oYI4kw+Q5ayB8wJo6alKKEuPbpVSwPqsFtAyt2P+M639PXG PMsEyBzqcEiArRI+vmqrozyMcD5uI7frX0+8026noV+T/BkxfK69kLVCAIhSFW4KhX5Q n9ZKd/yvA99zqx0NwDVmvPXFRBtuCgmIZ7KmnxhBA1M7gwhWc7gjr0/B1FJRf8flgE91 OkZq8un2glQq6KMOwWi7zAFuqO3xs5AgQsku+IlBnOiezQkWGpS7ZPQn+4cDhKgMDQ5l D6ZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=aCcRDefg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n5-20020a170906b30500b00992f30b2983si4367034ejz.849.2023.08.12.01.16.03; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=aCcRDefg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233345AbjHLH3n (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 12 Aug 2023 03:29:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36128 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229959AbjHLH3n (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Aug 2023 03:29:43 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C40E41B5; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 00:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD9D61011; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 07:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 188A4C433C8; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 07:29:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1691825385; bh=5mv/Qe6HbdjVE5i1Dz+Ml4OmoUQl8Eg1gB3kzSufA88=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aCcRDefgKUJyZTq4tgROwt3pVVTLBWA5KE5tfu9/cmJbuVvH/Mr3f2HwvIcPulXCT mpXC1pHmtmjXCyMkxeEY3rmYQvlQKajsx0wafciK2j9kmO3hPfypyhJo8rKjvkaOeg 31nYlPubA6eUxpOsCd0m5NMV1fBba4m5PNl7dVTc= Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 09:29:42 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Mirsad Todorovac Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter , Takashi Iwai , Kees Cook , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Brian Norris , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] test_fimware: return -ENOMEM instead of -ENOSPC on failed memory allocation Message-ID: <2023081213-reset-tadpole-fc94@gregkh> References: <20230812054346.168223-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230812054346.168223-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 07:43:47AM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: > [ Upstream commit 7dae593cd226a0bca61201cf85ceb9335cf63682 ] > > In a couple of situations like > > name = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!name) > return -ENOSPC; > > the error is not actually "No space left on device", but "Out of memory". > > It is semantically correct to return -ENOMEM in all failed kstrndup() > and kzalloc() cases in this driver, as it is not a problem with disk > space, but with kernel memory allocator failing allocation. > > The semantically correct should be: > > name = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!name) > return -ENOMEM; > > Cc: Dan Carpenter > Cc: Takashi Iwai > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez > Cc: Brian Norris > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14 > Fixes: c92316bf8e948 ("test_firmware: add batched firmware tests") > Fixes: 0a8adf584759c ("test: add firmware_class loader test") > Fixes: eb910947c82f9 ("test: firmware_class: add asynchronous request trigger") > Fixes: 061132d2b9c95 ("test_firmware: add test custom fallback trigger") > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230606070808.9300-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr/ > Signed-off-by: Mirsad Todorovac > > [ This is the backport of the patch to 4.19 and 4.14 branches. There are no ] > [ semantic differences in the commit. Backport is provided for completenes sake ] > [ so it would apply to all of the supported LTS kernels ] This commit is already in the 4.19.291 release, does it need to be included in there again for some reason? thanks, greg k-h