Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 12 Aug 2023 17:15:15 -0700
From:   Tree Davies <tdavies@darkphysics.net>
To:     Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
Cc:     gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com,
        anjan@momi.ca, error27@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename struct rx_ts_record
 references
Message-ID: <ZNggk9M5Xbg27Uq6@basil>
References: <20230812201702.83421-1-tdavies@darkphysics.net>
 <ZNf2FJNPF6A4jwcX@nam-dell>
 <ZNgRub125FKvIPXa@basil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZNgRub125FKvIPXa@basil>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 04:11:53PM -0700, Tree Davies wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:13:56PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 01:16:46PM -0700, Tree Davies wrote:
> > > This patch series fixes checkpatch warning Avoid CamelCase, for all references
> > > of struct rx_ts_record, and renames them to rx_ts for consistency and 
> > > readability. Each patch renames references for a single function.
> > > 
> > > Thank you in advance to the reviewers
> > > ~ Tree 
> > > 
> > > Tree Davies (16):
> > 
> > Here it says there are 16 patches, but you have only sent 6 patches. Are some
> > of them missing?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Nam
> > 
> Thanks Nam,
> 
> Yes they are missing. git send-email errored during submition. 
> I will resend. 
> Question: In this case do I need to send it as a v2?
> 
> Tree
> 

OK, I know what happened. I was rate limited by my email provider.
I've requested a limit increase.

I suppose I could break up the patch-set into multiple series and label
them as series A, B, and C?

Tree