Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:16:25 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        tanyuan@tinylab.org, thomas@t-8ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/nolibc: customize CROSS_COMPILE for all
 architectures
Message-ID: <20230813091625.GG8237@1wt.eu>
References: <cover.1691783604.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
 <a5deb231269cff5225be8331888fbea19337d5f9.1691783604.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a5deb231269cff5225be8331888fbea19337d5f9.1691783604.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 04:32:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> +CROSS_COMPILE_i386      ?= x86_64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_x86_64    ?= x86_64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_x86       ?= x86_64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_arm64     ?= aarch64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_arm       ?= arm-linux-gnueabi-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_mips      ?= mips64-linux-

Given that we don't support mips64, I'd suggest to ust mips-linux-
instead here for now. That doesn't seem right to ask users to
download a toolchain for a different architecture than the one
supported just because we can adapt to it.

Willy