Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2023 13:14:25 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression/bisected] Add IBPB decreases performance in two times
Message-ID: <20230813111425.GEZNi7EXyHOLQTNzFg@fat_crate.local>
References: <CABXGCsNTaNw3q1OciYq111vdr+-ouaRVmwVqVJH4iT0NqxFAcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230813082413.GAZNiTLaOxUNUHPvlf@fat_crate.local>
 <CABXGCsNoNaGLsuvHLRA7aG9FCckQpnXaXWoUGvRwzfRKNB4xzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230813093502.GBZNijxgueFxBTxWwG@fat_crate.local>
 <CABXGCsMrNz2SPYN=zLZTT7jU4axSi-XLm4bTm7K3NuWnc=yr9g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABXGCsMrNz2SPYN=zLZTT7jU4axSi-XLm4bTm7K3NuWnc=yr9g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 03:57:03PM +0500, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> Sure, I checked and got the same results as on the kernel with reverted commits.
> I suppose when new BIOS update will release the kernel would use
> automatically path `spec_rstack_overflow=microcode` and all users who
> faced with this issue not needed add `spec_rstack_overflow=microcode`
> to their kernel command line, right?

No, you have to specify it explicitly. The default mitigation is still
safe RET.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette