Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760087AbXKBTah (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:30:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757603AbXKBTa0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:30:26 -0400 Received: from smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.88]:47947 "HELO smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754693AbXKBTaZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:30:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=iJRO7SNb8zLEjZNQ9bxLpU9iqbX2ssrnHS8hnvVFk3p45Ql5N0ockzHYCVEn0GiuRdwlSux+8UGdadwFrFJCtn0JxrVhbTsyYm8rWhGHtHW96vINZQHP3UkuLVSE5jcFD4ET3jiM39bpmFiNHoY2rkE7zXpKnuW0mvVpxRsuq9U= ; X-YMail-OSG: ZsFbFQkVM1lPyOxyakd9RIUvG1O0C2jrMzXOwsndzhctZeZqJDkLKfv8O3me0q3.gyWtbeC47Q-- From: David Brownell To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: build #337 failed for 2.6.24-rc1-gb1d08ac In function `usbnet_set_settings': Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:30:22 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Randy Dunlap , Toralf =?iso-8859-1?q?F=F6rster?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev References: <200711012024.57412.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <200711021145.15542.david-b@pacbell.net> <20071102185751.GV30287@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20071102185751.GV30287@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711021230.22588.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1156 Lines: 34 On Friday 02 November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This approach has two disadvantages: > - it's complicated No more so than the problem itself. > - the MII stuff is an implementation detail, and we shouldn't bother > ? the user with it (especially since we can do better) That's a Kconfig policy that's not always followed. In this case, I was getting fed up with "select". It so rarely does what it needs to do, and I've started to think it'd be better to just always avoid that fragility than battle it. > If you want to keep the #ifdef's, what's the problem with the second > patch I proposed to fix this bug? For one thing, I didn't see it until after I posted this one... other than that, the basic approach could well be fine; I didn't go through it in detail. But on the other hand, it seems that only the ASIX code will work right; the DM9601 and MCS7830 Kconfig is different/wrong. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/