Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:25:03 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Cc:     cristian.marussi@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quic_rjendra@quicinc.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
        Chandra Sekhar Lingutla <quic_lingutla@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fixup perf microwatt support
Message-ID: <20230814092503.xdzafmqu5h3shrlz@bogus>
References: <20230811204818.30928-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230811204818.30928-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 02:18:18AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> The perf power scale value would currently be reported as bogowatts if the
> platform firmware supports microwatt power scale and meets the perf major
> version requirements. Fix this by populating version information in the
> driver private data before the call to protocol attributes is made.
> 
> CC: Chandra Sekhar Lingutla <quic_lingutla@quicinc.com>
> Fixes: 3630cd8130ce ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.1 perf power-cost in microwatts")
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> index c0cd556fbaae..30dedd6ebfde 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)

Please rebase any patch when posting upstream on upstream kernel tree.
This definitely looks like some downstream tree. I will adjust and apply
this time. This file never crossed 1000 line and this patch indicates
otherwise, so I am sure Qcom has some downstream changes in this file now.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep