Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4f66cded234462964899f2a661750d6798a57ec0.camel@bitron.ch>
 <CAJfpeguG4f4S-pq+_EXHxfB63mbof-VnaOy-7a-7seWLMj_xyQ@mail.gmail.com> <ZNozdrtKgTeTaMpX@tycho.pizza>
In-Reply-To: <ZNozdrtKgTeTaMpX@tycho.pizza>
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:35:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJfpegt6x_=F=mD8LEL4AZPbfCLGQrpurhtbDN4Ew50fd2ngqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] fuse: execve() fails with ETXTBSY due to async fuse_flush
To:     Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCrg_Billeter?= <j@bitron.ch>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 16:00, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza> wrote:

> It seems like we really do need to wait here. I guess that means we
> need some kind of exit-proof wait?

Could you please recap the original problem?

Thanks,
Miklos