Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:17:17 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Cc:     arnd@arndb.de, david.laight@aculab.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        tanyuan@tinylab.org, thomas@t-8ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] tools/nolibc: fix up size inflate regression
Message-ID: <ZNtszQeigYuItaKA@1wt.eu>
References: <20230813090037.GE8237@1wt.eu>
 <20230813133944.19604-1-falcon@tinylab.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230813133944.19604-1-falcon@tinylab.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 09:39:44PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > And we're done, you can then keep the simplified __sysret() macro for all
> > other call places.
> > 
> 
> Now, this issue is near to the end ;-)

I've now pushed the simplified fix (without changing the SET_ERRNO()
macro, enough last minute breaking changes for now) in branch
20230815-for-6.6-2.

The tests pass and riscv/loongarch are even very slightly smaller than
before (~8 bytes) but again that doesn't count as it depends on how the
compiler decides to arrange if/else branches.

I'll let Shuah know about these late fixes.

Regards,
Willy