Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:51:36 +0900
From:   Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel_team@skhynix.com,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com,
        linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
        duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org,
        tytso@mit.edu, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
        minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
        sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
        penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
        ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com,
        melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com,
        42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, chris.p.wilson@intel.com,
        gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com, max.byungchul.park@gmail.com,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, longman@redhat.com, hdanton@sina.com,
        her0gyugyu@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v10 25/25] dept: Track the potential waits of
 PG_{locked,writeback}
Message-ID: <20230821045136.GB73328@system.software.com>
References: <20230821034637.34630-1-byungchul@sk.com>
 <20230821034637.34630-26-byungchul@sk.com>
 <ZOLnRSdH4Wcrl67L@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZOLnRSdH4Wcrl67L@casper.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:25:41AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:46:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > @@ -377,44 +421,88 @@ static __always_inline int Page##uname(struct page *page)		\
> >  #define SETPAGEFLAG(uname, lname, policy)				\
> >  static __always_inline						\
> >  void folio_set_##lname(struct folio *folio)			\
> > -{ set_bit(PG_##lname, folio_flags(folio, FOLIO_##policy)); }	\
> > +{									\
> > +	set_bit(PG_##lname, folio_flags(folio, FOLIO_##policy));	\
> > +	dept_page_set_bit(&folio->page, PG_##lname);			\
> 
> The PG_locked and PG_writeback bits only actually exist in the folio;
> the ones in struct page are just legacy and never actually used.
> Perhaps we could make the APIs more folio-based and less page-based?

Yeah. I need to make it more folio-based. I will work on it. Thank you.

> >  static __always_inline void SetPage##uname(struct page *page)	\
> > -{ set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
> > +{									\
> > +	set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags);			\
> > +	dept_page_set_bit(page, PG_##lname);				\
> > +}
> 
> I don't think we ever call this for PG_writeback or PG_locked.  If
> I'm wrong, we can probably fix that ;-)

Okay then, I will assume this will never be used. So are you asking me
to get rid of this part, right?

> >  static __always_inline void __SetPage##uname(struct page *page)	\
> > -{ __set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
> > +{									\
> > +	__set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags);			\
> > +	dept_page_set_bit(page, PG_##lname);				\
> > +}
> 
> Umm.  We do call __SetPageLocked() though ... I'll fix those up to
> be __set_folio_locked().

Haha Okay. Lemme know when you get done on it. Thanks.

	Byungchul