Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <01b61118-a192-dde2-09aa-de73f2ab2b5c@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:32:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq-tag: update or fix functions documentation
Content-Language: en-US
To:     chengming.zhou@linux.dev, axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com,
        hch@lst.de
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        zhouchengming@bytedance.com
References: <20230821073528.3469210-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
 <20230821073528.3469210-5-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230821073528.3469210-5-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/21/23 00:35, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> 
> There are some misleading or wrong documentation in the functions of
> blk-mq-tag, update it as we're here.

Are all changes in this patch updates for documentation that should have been
updated by commit 2dd6532e9591 ("blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' arg of busy_tag_iter_fn")?
If not, please move any unrelated changes into a separate patch.

Please also consider adding the following to this patch:

Fixes: 2dd6532e9591 ("blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' arg of busy_tag_iter_fn")

Thanks,

Bart.