Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755158AbXKDRS2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:18:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753355AbXKDRSS (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:18:18 -0500 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org ([207.29.250.54]:54663 "EHLO twinlark.arctic.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752186AbXKDRSR (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:18:17 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 09:18:16 -0800 (PST) From: dean gaudet To: Felix von Leitner cc: Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Netdev List Subject: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT issues In-Reply-To: <20071102221912.GB4354@codeblau.de> Message-ID: References: <20071102013321.GA30893@codeblau.de> <472AD0AE.50106@cosmosbay.com> <20071102221912.GB4354@codeblau.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 524 Lines: 13 fwiw i also brought the TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT problems up the end of last year: http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg28916.html it's possible the final message in that thread is how we should define the behaviour, i haven't tried the TCP_SYNCNT idea though. -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/